Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdhiambo, Nyunja J
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-24T07:53:05Z
dc.date.available2013-05-24T07:53:05Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationPhDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/25181
dc.descriptionDoctor of Philososphyen
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the role of primary producers in supporting food webs leading to fisheries productivity in a tropical mangrove estuary, Gazi Bay, Kenya. A combinationof carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis and fish gut content analysis were usedto (i) trace the food-web structure of commercially and ecologically important fish; and (ii) to quantitatively determine whether the fish community is dependent on mangroves or seagrasses as theirbase of nutritional support. Three sampling locations representing mangrove and seagrass habitats were established in GaziBay. Within each location, replicate samples were collected for all the variables examined in this study including: fish; benthic macroinvertebrates; potential primary food / organic carbon sources i.e. mangroves, seagrasses, seagrass epiphytes, macroalgae; suspended particulate organicmatter (SPOM); dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC); and sediment organic matter (SOM). The autotrophic carbon sources supporting fisheries in the bay was studied through carbon ((313C) and nitrogen ((3lsN)stable isotope analysis (SIA) of muscle tissues of various fish species, enthic macroinvertebrates 'and a range of potential primary food sources. The results showed that man~r?ves had the most depleted 13Csignatures averaging -27.7 ±: 1.4 %0, followed by macroalgae (-20.4 ± 3.1 %0) and seagrasses (-15.1 ± 3.0 %0) were the most 3C-enriched.There was con~iderable overlap in the (3!3C;igmitures between fish (-16.1 ± 2.1 ~o), seagrasses (-15.1 ± 3.0 %0), seagrass epiphytes (-13.6 ±~~.3 %0) and macroalgae (-20.4 ± 3.1 60). Nevertheless, the signatures for most primary producers were sufficiently distinct indicating hat the dominant sources of carbon for fish are mainly the seagrass and their associated epiphyte ommunity, and possibly macroalgae. Mangrove-derived organic matter had a limited intribution to the overall fish food web. While investigating fish feeding habitats, the results showedthat fishes from the mangrove creeks had distinctly lower 813C signatures (-16.8 ± 2.0 %0) compared to those collected in the adjacent seagrass beds (-14.7 ± 1.7 %0). This indicated that these habitats acted as distinct sheltering and feeding zones for the fishes collected, although thereis frequent migration of fishes between mangrove and seagrass habitats influenced by tidal fluctuationsin the Bay. Studies on the benthic macroinvertebrate community structure indicated significantly high macroinvertebrate density in the sediments within the mangrove forest (11524 ± 2925 indo m-2) and seagrass beds (11671 ± 2082 indo rn"), as compared to the unvegetated sand flats (3772 ± 956indom-2 ) (ANOVA, F = 8.0318, P = 0014). The dominant macro invertebrate taxa in the Bay were:Polychaeta (29 %), Oligochaeta (27 %), Amphipoda (16 %) and Tanaidacea (14 %). Frequency analysis of all examined specimens showed that 67 % of macro invertebrate carbonisotopic signatures fell between -22 %0 and -18 %0, while 23 % had values between -18 %0 and -14 %0.These values fall within the carbon isotopic signatures range observed for Sediment Organic Matter (SaM), Suspended Particulate Organic Matter (SPOM), seagrass and their attached seagrass epiphytes. This overlap emphasizes the contribution of carbon from these organicmatter sources to the benthic food web. A comparative study on stable isotope ratios (8I3C; {)ISN) and gut content analysis (OCA) of 13 selected fish species was carried out. 813C for fishes ranged between -22.5 %0 and -14.0 %0, with averages of -17.1 ± 0.8-%0, -16.5 ± 1.0 %0, -15.2~± 0.3 %0 and -17.6 ± 1.0 %0 for fish/invertebrate feeders (piscivore/zoobenthivores), invertebrate feeders (zoobenthivores), omnivorousand herbivorous fishes, respectively. It was observed that gut content of most fishes classifiedas fish/invertebrate feeders and pure invertebrate feeders had high proportion of benthic crustaceans (mainly amphipods and copepods), Outs of herbivorous fishes were dominated by plant material, although Siganus sp. also fed on some amphipods, copepods, tanaidacea and nematodes,which indicated the presence of omnivory for the siganids. Stable isotope and gut content analysis showed clear food resource partitioning between the dominant herbivorous fishes(Siganus sutor and Leptoscarus vaigiensis). Siganus sp. fed on macroalage and epiphytes, whileL. vaigiensis fed on a large proportion seagrass in addition to macroalgae and epiphytes. Overall,results from both SIA and GCA pointed at the opportunistic feeding strategy adopted by mostfishes. This, therefore, means that fishes ate available and accessible prey that sometimes wasnot easy to assimilate. Quantitative measure on the relative contribution of various organic matter sources to the dietof dominant herbivores (Siganus sutor and Leptoscarus vaigiensis) was carried out using an IsoSourceModel. The model estimates of feasible contributions of each organic matter indicated differencesin the diet of S. sutor and L. vaigiensis. The model emphasized the importance of SPOMand epiphytes in the diet of S. sutor as shown by their relatively high proportional contributionin their diet (for example me,dian contribution for SPOM and epiphytes was 34 % and 25 %, respectively). Conversely,' the IsoSource model confirmed the high nutritional importance of seagrass and epiphytes in the diet of L. vaigiensis (median contribution for seagrassand epiphytes was 52 % and 39 %, respectively). From these results, we conclude that many coastal fishesderive their primary carbon from seagrassbeds either directly through grazing or indirectly t~.rough trophic linkages in the detrital foodweb. There is minimal use of mangrove habitats as feeding grounds for fishes, but this habitat still supports other ecological functions in the ecosystem, which indirectly enhances fisheries productivity. Therefore, due to -the ecological connectivity between mangroves and seagrass ecosystems, integrated management of the two systems is necessary to sustain the productivityof coastal fisheries .en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleFood web structure in a tropical mangrove - seagrass ecosystem in Kenyaen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record