Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBikundo, Edwin
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T11:30:12Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T11:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationEast African Law Journal Vol 2 2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/100843
dc.description.abstractIn discussing the legality or illegality of the use of force and its normative manifestation there is a universal yet inarticulate major premise posited, that at its simplest says, 'there is a right to peace". This right to peace and concomitant duty? to keep the peace inheres in the nation state but also, it is argued, in Individuals" through the operation of international human rights instruments and customary international law-. The laws that govern entry into and conduct of war (or arguably armed conflict) are traditionally divided into two, being, jus ad bellum and jus in bello', The contemporary arguments extending 'jus in bello principles into internal armed conflict just as cogently apply to jus ad oellum- .en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectA "Right to Peace" and Prosecuting the Crime of Aggressionen_US
dc.titleA "Right to Peace" and Prosecuting the Crime of Aggressionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States