Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCirocchi, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorRandolph, Jutsus
dc.contributor.authorCheruiyot, Isaac
dc.contributor.authorDavies, R Justin
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, James
dc.contributor.authorGioia, Sara
dc.contributor.authorReznitskii, Pavel
dc.contributor.authorLancia, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorCarlini, Luigi
dc.contributor.authorFedeli, Piergiorgio
dc.contributor.authorSaverio, Salomone di
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Brandon M
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T05:41:40Z
dc.date.available2021-08-11T05:41:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.citationCirocchi R, Randolph J, Cheruiyot I, Davies RJ, Wheeler J, Gioia S, Reznitskii P, Lancia M, Carlini L, Fedeli P, di Saverio S, Henry BM. Surgical anatomy of sigmoid arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2021 Jan 5:S1479-666X(20)30185-2. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.11.012. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33414045.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33414045/
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/155126
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of the number of sigmoid arteries (SA) and variations in their origins. Methods: A thorough systematic search of literature through February 2020 was conducted on major electronic databases to identify eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis using Metafor package in R. The primary outcome was the variations in the SA origin (according to modified Zebrowski classification), and the secondary outcome was the prevalence of the number of SA. Results: A total of 22 studies (n = 2653 patients) were included. Type 1 modified Zebrowski (separated origins or common trunk of the SA originating from descending recto-sigmoid trunk (DRST)) was the most common origin type of the SA (pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) = 49.67% (95% CI 32. 67- 66.71)), while type 3 (separated origins or common trunk of 1 or 2 SA originating from DRST or superior rectal artery (SRA) and 1 or 2 SA originating from DRST or SRA) was the least common (PPE = 0.18%; 95% CI 0.00-2.82)). Of the Type 1 variants, the not specified (N.S) variant was by far the most prevalent. The number of SA ranged from one to five, with three being the mode (PPE = 42.3%). Conclusion: This is the most comprehensive analysis of arterial vascular anatomy of the sigmoid colon. In light of the highly variable anatomical pattern displayed by the SA, thorough pre-operative knowledge of their anatomy can be crucial in minimizing incidences of iatrogenic injury.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectMeta-analysis; Sigmoid arteries.en_US
dc.titleSurgical anatomy of sigmoid arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States