Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorK’Akumu, O. A.,
dc.contributor.authorGateri, C. W
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-24T10:58:52Z
dc.date.available2022-04-24T10:58:52Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-31
dc.identifier.citationK’Akumu, O. A., & Gateri, C. W. (2022). Evaluation of the Nairobi-Thika Road Improvement Project in the Context of Inclusive Development. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 00219096221084254.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00219096221084254
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/160206
dc.description.abstractThis paper converts the six reasons for inclusive development proposed by Gupta into a heuristic device for evaluation of inclusive development in road infrastructure projects in Nairobi. The Gupta Rationale entails six key evaluative elements of, that is, whether the project has achieved: Welfare of the poor and marginalized, Human rights, Economic Sustainability, Human security and livelihood support, Inclusive decision-making and Non production of poverty. This study subjected the Nairobi-Thika Road Improvement Project to this evaluative criterion as case study. The results of the evaluation are that the project mainly focused on enhancing the comfort of the private motorist, no serious violations except on few occasions when structures used by informal SMEs were demolished without offers of viable alternatives, the project led to improved infrastructure with significant economic benefits, densification and crowding occasioned by high land prices has led to overstretched infrastructural services thereby threatening the human security in the neighbourhoods along the corridor, the project was not inclusive in terms of decision-making but was a top-down outfit that did little to incorporate local governments and communities, and that it caused production of poverty by destroying livelihoods of petty traders and employees of SMEs that were operating along the corridor. The paper demonstrates that the Gupta Rationale can clearly assess the extent of inclusive development in a project and help to reach the conclusion as to whether a particular project’s processes and outcomes engender inclusive development. In the case of Nairobi, for instance, the device has helped reach a rational decision that development is not inclusive. Recommendation is made that the Gupta Rationale should be used in the ex-ante and ex-post evaluation of road improvement projects or any other urban development project for that matter. This would help mainstream inclusive urban development.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGEen_US
dc.subjectAfrican cities, inclusive development, road infrastructure, urban economy, Nairobi, Kenyaen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the Nairobi-Thika Road Improvement Project in the Context of Inclusive Developmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record