Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaai, Susan C
dc.contributor.authorSansone, Genevieve
dc.contributor.authorKaai, Susan C
dc.contributor.authorSansone, Genevieve
dc.contributor.authorMeng, Gang
dc.contributor.authorOng'ang'o, Jane R
dc.contributor.authorGoma, Fastone
dc.contributor.authorIkamari, Lawrence
dc.contributor.authorQuah, Anne C K
dc.contributor.authorFong, Geoffrey T
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T06:59:45Z
dc.date.available2023-11-17T06:59:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationKaai SC, Sansone G, Meng G, Ong'ang'o JR, Goma F, Ikamari L, Quah ACK, Fong GT. Quasi-experimental evaluation of Kenya's pictorial health warnings versus Zambia's single text-only warning: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Project. Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):139-145. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056396. Epub 2021 Jun 11. PMID: 34117097; PMCID: PMC9985766.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34117097/
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/164037
dc.description.abstractBackground: Population studies in mostly high-income countries have shown that pictorial health warnings (PHWs) are much more effective than text-only warnings. This is the first quasi-experimental evaluation of the introduction of PHWs in Africa, comparing the change from text-only to PHWs in Kenya to the unchanged text-only health warning in Zambia. Methods: Data were from International Tobacco Control (ITC) Surveys in Kenya (n=1495), and Zambia (n=1628), cohort surveys of nationally representative samples of adult smokers in each country. The ITC Kenya Survey was conducted in 2012 and 2018 (2 years after the 2016 introduction of three PHWs). The ITC Zambia Survey was conducted in 2012 and 2014 with no change to the single text-only warning. Validated indicators of health warning effectiveness (HWIs) (salience: noticing, reading; cognitive reactions: thinking about health risks, thinking about quitting; and behavioural reactions: avoiding warnings; forgoing a cigarette because of the warnings), and a summary measure-the Labels Impact Index (LII)-measured changes in warning impact between the two countries. Results: PHWs implemented in Kenya led to a significant increase in all HWIs and the LII, compared with the text-only warning in Zambia. The failure to implement PHWs in Zambia led to a substantial missed opportunity to increase warning effectiveness (eg, an estimated additional 168 392 smokers in Zambia would have noticed the warnings). Conclusions: The introduction of PHWs in Kenya substantially increased the effectiveness of warnings. These results provide strong empirical support for 34 African countries that still have text-only warnings, of which 31 are Parties of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and are thus obligated to implement PHWs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectKeywords: global health; low/middle income country; packaging and labelling; public policy.en_US
dc.titleQuasi-experimental evaluation of Kenya's pictorial health warnings versus Zambia's single text-only warning: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Projecten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States