Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGachambi, L N
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-15T05:57:32Z
dc.date.available2013-05-15T05:57:32Z
dc.date.issued1990-01
dc.identifier.citationGachimbi, L.N(1990)Land degradation and its control in the Kibwezi area, Kenyaen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/22729
dc.descriptionMsc Thesisen
dc.description.abstractMost of our semi-arid land is threatened with increased land deterioration due to changes in land use especially in areas where soils have sealing properties which hinder infiltration of rain- water. The study was carried out in Kibwezi Division, Machakos District, a distance of 220 km. from Nairobi. It was designed to investigate major causes of land deterioration following human settlement around 1963 and low cost measures of reversing it. The experiment was designed to investigate whether slashing bush and spreading it on the denuded ground would improve infiltration and if so, whether the effect would be due to interception of rainfall energy and reduced sealing, interception of runoff, insect activity i.e. termites or other organisms living on the deadwood and breaking the seal in the process or due to a combination of one or more factors. This was investigated using twelve (12) runoff plots on a mean slope of 0.1% with ferral chromic Luvisols and 20% brushwood cover. Different forms of treatments under natural rainfall were applied. Supplementary studies on infiltration; after insect activity on the soil seal when the soil seal is intact and after the soil seal is removed ,were conducted by surface ponding next to runoff plots for comparison. A farm survey with a questionnaire on causes and state of land deterioration, and measures used to encourage revegetation, was carried out on settled areas. Studies were conducted to determine the botanical composition of virgin land. Socia-economic data on some plants, for example, Baobabs left in cropland, was collected from the local communities. Treatment effects compared with the control plots, were significant (P (- 0.05) in reducing soil loss and runoff. Rainfall and runoff interception using 20% brushwood cover together with or without insect activity is significant in reducing soil loss and runoff. Bare denuded plots lost an average of 53% of the rainfall as runoff and 65.5t/ha. of soil compared with 38% of rainfall as runoff and 19tjha. of soil from plots with rainfall/ runoff interception together with insect activity. Rainfall interception only and rainfall/runoff inter.~eption without insect activity lost a total of 32t/ha. and 25.7t/ha. respectively. Efficiency values in reducing soil loss and runoff were generally high for all the treatments. Raintall/runoff interception with insect activity treatment reduced soil loss by 71% ,without insect activity 61%, and rainfall interception only by 51% Soil sealing in semi-arid areas as a result of raindrop impact could be due to low organic matter (~ 0.1%) and high sand content ( ~ 69%) and fine clay fractions which could possibly block the soil pores after the soil aggregate disintegrates under raindrop impact. Soil sealing may also be attributed to runoff. Clay fractions in the soil, act like cement in sand and it contributes to the hardness of the soils during the dry season. The effect of this is low infiltration, high runoff and water erosion when rains come. Clay content at the soil surface causes decreased porosity and thus soil sealing. Insect activities were found to assist in creating rough and fragmented surfaces on the denuded sealed soils. This was found to enhance rainfall infiltration for a short period on ponding water, implying that enhanced revegetation of denuded lands can be achieved by creating conditions necessary for rainwater to pond. Settlement in the area ,though relatively recent and mainly within the last 25 years, has resulted in serious erosion in some places. This indicates that much greater attention should be paid to soil and water conservation. Most of the land deterioration from stable vegetated land with minimal soil erosion has been due to vegetation removal exposing soil to accelerated erosion and increased runoff in most cultivated farms. This has been made worse by poorly maintained and . lor lack of soil and water conservation measures on cropland and lack of proper grazingmanagement and jor restoring cover whenever it is diminished, by using measures(example, temporary bunds, basins etc. ) intended to pren
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Nairobien
dc.subjectLand degradationen
dc.subjectKibwezi Divisionen
dc.subjectKenyaen
dc.titleLand degradation and its control in the Kibwezi area, Kenyaen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherDepartment of Range Management, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record