Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMunira, M A Kaderdina
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-23T07:36:51Z
dc.date.available2013-05-23T07:36:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationMaster of Medicine, Ophthalmology,en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/24646
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVEST:he study was aimed at describing the characteristics of patients presenting at low vision clinic of the Kikuyu Eye Unit, with emphasis on the underlying causes of low vision, of which it would identify preventable and potentially treatable causes, to document any associateddisability, and to assess the type of LVA's prescribed to these patients. STUDYDESIGN: Retrospective case series STUDYSETIING: P.C.E.A Kikuyu Hospital, Eye Unit, Low Vision Clinic, Kiambu District, 20km from Nairobi. SUBJECTS:Any new patient assessed in the Low Vision Clinic from 1st January 2007 to si" December 2007, and found to have low vision as per the low vision case definition. MATERIALSAND METHODS: Copies of low vision assessment sheets of patients were scrutinized and records of eligible patients were retrieved from the hospital registry and analyzed. The data was collected on a structured questionnaire and entered into Microsoft access,then exported to Microsoft Excel and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS). RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety nine files were reviewed, of which 190 patients were found to be eligible for this study. A hundred and twenty two (64.2%) were adults and 68 (35.8%) were children and the M:F ratio was found to be approximately 2:1 in both adults and children. 45.6% of adults were classified as low vision category IV patients, while 41.2% were category "I. Only 1 adult was classified in category I. Children mainly belonged to category "I (66.4%). The majority of patients had a 10gMAR BCVA of 0.5 to 1.0(69.7% adults and 57.4% children) with a range of 0.5 to 2.0. HVF was done for 11 patients (5.8%) and field defects within 10° of or involving the point of fixation were found in 7 of them (63.6%). Many of the patients hailed from Nairobi, Central and Rift Valley provinces and the main points of referral were in Nairobi in the files where it was recorded. Of the 122 adults, 64 had retinal disorders, mainly diabetic retinopathy, maculopathy, Stargardt's disease and retinitis Pigmentosa. The other common causes of low vision in adults were optic nerve disorders including glaucoma 1 andoptic atrophy, and corneal scarring and opacification. In children, the main cause was optic atrophy, followed by maculopathy, amblyopia and keratoconus. Fifty six percent of low visionin children is preventable or potentially treatable. Of the causes of low vision found in adults,16 were potentially treatable and 64 were preventable accounting for 80 of 122 adults (65.6%) in whom low vision could have been avoided. Associated disabilities were found in only 6 of the patients who presented at the Low Vision Clinic in 2007. LVA's were provided to 72.6% of patients, and it was found that near optical aids were more likely to be given to adults. For distance optical aids, the commonest given to adults was the 4x telescope while for children it was the 2x or the 4x telescope. In near optical aids, both adults and children were most likely to be provided with a +4 DSspectacle magnifier. The non-optical aids most commonly provided to adults were training in functional print reading and orientation and mobility training. Children were provided with CBM boxes, colour filter lenses and visual stimulation techniques. VA for near was found to improve significantly in adults with the use of LVA's and a significant number of children <16 yrs were introduced into the integrated programme/given school placements/vocational training. Eight patients refused LVA's at prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that the low vision project was geared towards children at inception, there were surprisingly more adults presenting at the low vision clinic than children. Centres in Nairobi referred a number of patients for low vision assessment and management, and patients at the clinic were usually from Nairobi, Central or Rift Valley province. Most of the patients were likely to be classified in category III/IV of low vision with a 10gMAR BCVA of 0.5-1.0, which bodes well for the project since this signifies that these patients can be assisted with appropriate aids. Visual field testing was done in fewer patients than necessary. Considering the underlying causes of low vision, diabetic retinopathy was the commonest cause in adults, and optic atrophy in children. More than half of the cases of low vision could have been avoided with appropriate prevention, or early diagnosis and appropriate, timely treatment. Associated disability was found in fewer patients than expected. Adults were more likely to benefit from near optical aids, training in reading functional print and O&M training, while children were more likely to be given distance 2en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity Of Nairobien
dc.titleCharacteristics of low vision Patients presenting at kikuyu eye Unit low vision clinicen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.departmenta Department of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, ; bDepartment of Mental Health, School of Medicine, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
local.publisherCollege of Health Sciencesen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record