Enhancing water use efficiency of Cassava and Sorghum based cropping systems in Eastern Uganda
Abstract
Water flow and storage within the root zone constrains water availability and use in rain-fed crop
production, especially in the dryland cropping systems, where farmers are resource-strained and
are not motivated to practice soil and water management. A study was carried out in eastern
Uganda (34° 0' E and 1° 40' N) to: a) evaluate the effect of tillage and cropping systems on soil
water storage, b) establish the water use efficiency in cassava-sorghum based cropping systems,
c) examine the fanners' perceptions and understanding of soil moisture availability and establish
whether knowledge/competences on soil moisture availability is used in planning cropping
cycles in the cassava-sorghum cropping systems.
A field experiment was laid out in a randomised complete block design (RCBD) consisting of
two tillage practices (mouldboard ploughing and ripping) and six cropping systems; i.e. i) sole
cassava, ii) sole sorghum, iii) sole cowpea, iv) cassava + sorghum, v) cassava +cowpea, vi)
sorghum + cowpea comprised the treatments and were replicated three times. Soil surface
roughness was measured immediately after ploughing and two months later. Soil moisture
content was measured fortnightly at 0-10 and 20-40cm depths. Evapotranspiration (ET) was
estimated using the soil water balance approach. Yield of each crop was recorded at the end of
each growing period. Water use efficiency (WUE) (kg ha" mm") was calculated as a ratio of
yield (kg ha-I
) to ET (mm). A household-level survey was designed to collect responses on
household, production and field management characteristics and, knowledge on soil and water
management in the cassava-sorghum cropping systems.
Soil moisture content was higher under ripping than mouldboard ploughing but, the upper (0-
lOcm) layer had more moisture under mouldboard ploughing, while ripping accumulated more
moisture in the lower (20-40cm) layer of the root zone. Soil surface roughness did not differ two
months after mouldboard ploughing giving rise to a relatively negligible surface runoff. Water
use efficiency (WUE) varied significantly (a= 0.05) between cropping systems with the highest
observed in cassava (34.38kg ha-I mm") while the lowest was 3.76kg ha-I mm-I for sorghum. In
both tillage practices WUE did not differ appreciably .. Also, ET varied (a= 0.05) between
cropping systems but was similar in both mouldboard and ripper ploughed plots. Cassava +
cowpea intercrop under mouldboard ploughing gave the best cassava yield (20,023 kg ha"),
however tillage practice did not significantly (a = 0.05) affect the yield in sole cassava
treatments. Cowpea yield was higher (8,397 kg ha') under mouldboard ploughing than ripper
ploughing (5,771 kg ha'). Sorghum yield was highest (1679 kg ha-1
) under ripper ploughing
while the lowest was observed in sorghum + cowpea intercrop under mouldboard ploughing. The
change in soil moisture content was more negative in the mouldboard ploughed plots than in
ripped plots specifically for sole cassava (-4.215 mm) cassava + cowpea (-4.736 mm). The
household is a major source of labour for the cassava and sorghum farms with 53.8 % of the
households offering 4-6 persons to work on the farms. Up to 28% of the households did not offer
anyone for off-farm labour. Labour and knowledge at household level was used to manage the
land and most households derived their livelihood from exploiting land. Up to 65 and 59% of the
farmers allocated a quarter of their land to sorghum and cassava respectively. Farmers viewed
soil and water management to have long term benefits, reduce soil erosion, and likely to increase
yields on the farm. Fanners' positively exploited their competence in using crop rotation plans,
selecting the right seed and evaluating the soil fertility status on field. However, the competence
in detecting water stress in crops and altering crop spacing to manage soil moisture was not
utilized when planning cassava-sorghum cropping cycles.
Sponsorhip
The University of NairobiPublisher
Department of Agricultural Economics