Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNyatwongi, K. B
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-07T09:16:33Z
dc.date.available2013-06-07T09:16:33Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationA thesis submitted in part fulfillment for the degree of Master of Arts ( Planning) in the University of Nairobi.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/29907
dc.description.abstractThe thesis represents an attempt to address the issue as to how small towns can and do plays significant and positive role in promoting rural development and prosperity. A central feature in the study is that the growth of small urban centres is a necessary condition and prerequisite for rural transformation since the small urban town is perceived as a catalyst for rural improvement. It is apparent from the study thesis that governlments can do much to stimulate the development of small urban centres which may have positive repercussions for their hinterlands provided that they are willing to permit greater decentralisatlon and allow , devolution of power at the local levels. Further more careful selection of investments in Infrastructure may provide conditions to further encourage the attraction of small towns. The influence of governments can however also have negative consequences for urban centres and rural development. The local governments incapacitated by weak resource base may not provide the physical infrastructure needed in order for these towns to deliver. Consequently -instead of providing opportunities for investment, employment and social opportunities they turn parasitic; sacking resources from their rural hinterlands without reciprocating in the form of increased linkages. The small towns thus' form collection centres for the wider national capitalist economy where the rural resources are channeled outwards to the detriment of the, former. The capital SUI-plus ( financial savings) are invested far off in bigger towns that .have basic infrastructure ( and therefore investments Opportunities ), whereas the local centres meant to offer- such opportunities either stagnate or even decay off. To some extent this is true for the study area based on the field findings. Faced with a myriad of constraints; physical, political and economic, Keroka town can't deliver to the satisfaction of the local demand, thus investments are taken to immediate centres like Kisii, Sotik and of late Nyamlra denying Keroka the opportunity to develop irrespective of its locational advantages within the two districts. This observation explains the wide gap between the potential benefits and actual functions of small towns; which was one of the initial reason for developing interest in the research topic. Tile role and influence of small towns in stimulating socio-econmic activities in their rural setting has however been demonstrated to be positive and constructive throughout the thesis. With minimal investment in basic infrastructure, small towns can greatly enhance the rural development process thereby promoting Rural-Urban balance. The selection and hence the elevation of designated small towns as set-vice centres, should not be apolitical pawn but a scclo-econornlc criteria should be developed if they have to be functionally beneficial to enhancing rural-urban balance and hence to a nationally-integrated economy. The success of national policies towards a sustainable economy will largely depend on how well small towns are equipped to meet soclo- economic aspirations of their local population and this calls for political commitment in ensuring efficient and equitable distribution of the available scarce resources.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleThe social-economic influence of small urban centres on their hinterlands: a case study of Keroka town, Nyamira district.en
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherUrban and regional planning, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record