Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGan, Yantai
dc.contributor.authorStobbe, Elmer H
dc.contributor.authorNjue, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T06:56:30Z
dc.date.available2013-06-18T06:56:30Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.citationVol. 36 No. 1, p. 165-168en
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.crops.org/publications/cs/abstracts/36/1/CS0360010165
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/35307
dc.description.abstractFast and uniform seedling emergence increases yield potential of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in short-season areas. An accurate method of quantifying rate of seedling emergence is needed. In this study, we compared the relative effectiveness of the Gompertz, Logistic, and Weibull models in quantifying emergence rate of spring wheat. ‘Roblin’ wheat was grown in a growth room under five soil water potential: − 0.002, − 0.165, − 0.41, − 1.00, and − 1.45 MPa. Daily-recorded emergence data were fitted to each of the models. The analyses of stability and accuracy functions, residual sum of squares, and variance showed that the Weibull model was not appropriate in quantifying rate of emergence.The Gompertaz and Logistic models functioned in a similar way with great stability and accuracy in most cases. The Gompertz predictions most closely fitted the observed set of responses with residual points scattered around zero. For lognormally distributed emergence patterns common under field conditions, the Gompertz model provided the most appropriate characterization of emergence.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleEvaluation of Selected Nonlinear Regression Models in Quantifying Seedling Emergence Rate of Spring Wheaten
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherCollege of Physical and Biological Sciencesen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record