dc.description.abstract | Rural households greatly depend on non-timber forest products (NTFPs) to sustain livelihoods,
more so in meeting household basic daily needs. Specifically in Kakamega forest
households depend on NTFPs such as firewood to meet household energy needs, herbal
medicines for ailment treatment, pastures to feed household stock, thatch grass to maintain
shelters, and fruits and vegetables for food. Since these direct products are obtained from
the forest free of charge and have no efficient market, their economic contribution to rural
household economy remains unknown yet their role is factually immense. Establishing the
economic value of NTFPs consumed by households therefore becomes very necessary in
understanding the actual contribution NTFPs make in the sustenance of rural livelihoods.
This study estimated and compared economic value of NTFPs consumed by rural households
living around Kakamega forest using three valuation approaches namely: substitutes’
prices method direct prices method and opportunity cost of time method. Socioeconomic,
institutional and geophysical data that included household characteristics such as age,
gender, household sizes, occupations, land and liverstock ownership, NTFPs consumption
quantities (and that of coresponding substitutes), time expended on extraction, time values,
prices of NTFPs (and the substitutes)on local retail markets, distances to the forests and
forest management regimes were collected in the areas surrounding Kakamega forest using
a semi-structured questionnaire. Results show that the substitute value is highest followed
by directly priced value and lastly by the value generated through the opportunity cost of
time, with an annual average consumption of US $120, US$92 and US$78, respectively, per
household. The paper concludes with important policy recommendations for conservation
of Kakamega forest. | en |