Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGachene, C. K. K.
dc.contributor.authorMureithi, J. G.
dc.contributor.authorMburu, M.W. K.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-17T11:26:46Z
dc.date.available2014-07-17T11:26:46Z
dc.date.issued2011-09
dc.identifier.citationOptimimization of Agricultural Value Chains for sustainable Developmenten_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/73158
dc.descriptionOral presentation at aGRO 2011 Biennial Conferenceen_US
dc.description.abstractHigh biomass yielding legume Mucuna pruriens L (mucuna) can improve soil nutrient status in low input maize production systems if integrated as a cover crop. The amount of mucuna biomass would be influenced by water and light use in the systems. Field experiments were conducted at the University of Nairobi Kabete Field Station for three seasons to investigate the effects of mucuna planting density and planting time on light and water use of maizemucuna intercrop. Maize was inter-planted with mucuna at two mucuna planting densities and three planting times. Mucuna planting densities of 44,000 and 88,000 plants ha' were obtained by planting one and two rows of mucuna between maize, respectively. The planting times were 0, 2 and 4 weeks after planting maize. The experiment design was randomized complete block replicated three times. Canopy photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) interception, soil water content, mucuna and maize biomass and maize grain yield were measured. Sole mucuna, maize-mucuna intercrop, sole maize and mucuna under maize intercepted 90%, 80%, 65% and 30%, respectively of PAR. Soil water content was comparable among the treatments. Maize grain yield was comparable in sole and intercrop but mucuna biomass in the intercrop was reduced by 26-56%. Land equivalent ratio was 0.96. Planting density did not influence mucuna biomass but delayed planting reduced biomass at 10% per week. The amount of mucuna biomass produced in the intercrop can improve maize production. Planting mucuna at the same time as maize is the best option in an intercrop system. Maize-mucuna rotation would be a better option where land is not limiting.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Council of Science and Technology, The Kenya Seed Companyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Agriculture, University of Nairobien_US
dc.subjectroot length densityen_US
dc.subjectneutron probe,en_US
dc.subjectCeptometer,en_US
dc.titleWater and light use in maize intercropped with Mucunaen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.type.materialenen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record