Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMusyoki, Carolyne Minoo
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-26T06:36:16Z
dc.date.available2015-08-26T06:36:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/90072
dc.description.abstractIn recognition of the importance of the aquaculture sector in Kenya, the government in the year 2008 increased its investment into the sector through Economic Stimulus Program (ESP). In executing the project, 200, 300 and 100 fish ponds were constructed per constituency in the first, second and final phase respectively. This unprecedent increase in aquaculture investment may result to increased production of fish and changes in water quality to the environment. Pollution of water resources by pond effluents is mainly the most complaint, and this concern has attracted the greatest amount of official attention in most countries. The characterization of fish farm effluents and the quantification of the impact they have on the environment will provide the much needed information and data for decision makers to formulate the necessary policies for safeguarding the environment. As yet, the impact of the increased investment on environmental water quality and socio economic benefits remains to be evaluated. This study therefore determined the influence of increased aquaculture investments on water quality and economic benefits in Central Kenya using Gatundu South Constituency as a case in point. The study determined the following in the study area: water quality parameters in the main rivers used as source of water for fish farming; changes in water quality due to effluent discharge in rivers; water quality parameters in the ponds and the socioeconomic impact of ESP fish farming project. Sampling of water was done during the month of January and February 2014. Water quality data sampled from the rivers and ponds included: dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, water temperature, salinity, Nitrate- Nitrogen concentration (NO3-N) and Ortho-phosphate concentration. (PO4-P) Survey data on the socio-economic benefits were collected in three areas in Gatundu South using questionnaires. Water quality data were presented as means and spatial differences analyzed using One-Way ANOVA. Frequency distribution and chi-square were used to analyze the socio-economic data. The results of water quality analysis indicated that most of the parameters analyzed were within the recommended range of water quality for most aquatic organisms. There were significant differences in all the water quality parameters analyzed in the three rivers except for NO3-N, One-Way ANOVA; F = 0.624, df = 2, 6, P = 0.567). The overall concentration of the NO3-N ranged from 0.66 to 0.70 mg/l. ( p < 0.05) reflecting variations in the location of the rivers. In the ponds, water quality parameters reflected low values of DO, and pH, with slightly higher values of salinity, NO3-N concentration, and PO4-P concentration. In areas of effluent discharge significantly (One-Way ANOVA, (p< 0.05) lower DO, pH and higher salinity, NO3-N concentration, and PO4-P concentration were recorded reflecting water quality effects of the effluents in the riverine waters. It was also noted that fish farms effluent contained pollutants that can affect water quality, but the pollutants magnitudes were within the NEMA water quality standards of effluent discharge were suspended solids is expected to be 30mg/l maximum and nitrate- 100mg/l maximum. The values were impacted more for farmers within the ESP programmes and this can be attributed to readily available inputs which they were not paying for, hence tended to misuse them. Because the rivers in Gatundu serves as a source of water supply for drinking, washing, fishing and swimming, impacts of pond water discharge into natural systems should be closely monitored in order to avoid adverse effects like localised eutrophication and a change in the trophic structure. There was a significant difference in all socio-demographic variables of the respondents who participated in this study. Also it was evident that farmers who participated in the Economic Stimulus Programme (ESP) had lower fish production cycles, higher production volumes and revenues and therefore resulted to higher margins compared to farmers without ESP support.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleImpacts of aquaculture on water quality and economic benefits in Central Kenya: A case study of Gatundu South Constituencyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialen_USen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record