Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTanui, Charles K
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-26T12:47:47Z
dc.date.available2015-08-26T12:47:47Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/90121
dc.descriptionThesisen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the relationship between restitution program and the livelihood of victims of 2008 PEV in Kamara Ward, Kuresoi North Constituency in Nakuru County in the period 2007-2014. The Ward is multiethnic with majority being the Kikuyu, the Kalenjin and the Kisii. The restitution can only be made effective if it serves to mitigate the challenges faced by the victims of PEV and the lessons learnt be brought to the attention of policy makers at the line ministries and the Parliament. The general objective of this research study was to find out the influence of Government restitution on the PEV victims’ livelihood with specific objectives being; to establish how land restitution influences the PEV victims’ livelihood; to explore how provision of financial restitution influences the PEV victims’ livelihood; to examine the influence of legal justice on the PEV victims’ livelihood and the influence of security on the PEV victims’ livelihood of Kamara Ward. The study adopted descriptive survey design. The field survey tool for data collection was questionnaires. Purposive sampling was used to select Kamara Ward since it is cosmopolitan and a major casualty of PEV. Systematic Simple random sampling was also used to select a total of 394 respondents. The data was processed and analyzed using descriptive statistics while multiple regression analysis was used to establish any relationships between the restitution (KRP) and PEV victims’ livelihood performance. The study established that majority of the respondents were land owners with land ranging from half an acre to 50 acres. The study found out that majority of the respondents were not compensated after the events of the 2008 PEV, that majority of PEV victims’ lands were not occupied illegally and the Government had no supporting laws to compensate all those affected by PEV which, to a greater extent, affected the compensation of the victims of PEV in Kenya and that the respondents felt safer after the Government enhanced security. The study therefore concluded that majority of the residents in Kamara ward owned land ranging from half an acre to fifty acres (50 acres) and majority were peasant farmers and most were not compensated financially and those compensated received a financial restitution of less than Ksh 50,000. In addition, the study concluded that their land was not occupied after the 2008 PEV and that the aggressors were compelled to return whatever he/she took from 2008 PEV victims. The study therefore recommends that the Government should initiate a framework that will ensure that all the PEV victims are compensated with land, should implement the financial restitution programme to ensure that all the PEV victims are financially compensated and use laws and policies through relevant authorities to reclaim and ensure safe return of PEV victims to their homes that have been illegally occupied. In addition, the study recommends that government, nonGovernmental Organizations (NGOs), churches and even individuals should help PEV victims to access basic needs such as food, shelter, security, health, education and sources of livelihood once they return to their farmsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.titleInfluence of restitution program on the livelihood of victims of post-election violence: a case of Kamara ward, Nakuru county, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.type.materialen_USen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record