• Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • BioMedical Journal Articles
    • Biomed Full Text Articles
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • BioMedical Journal Articles
    • Biomed Full Text Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Limitation of using synthetic human odours to test mosquito repellents

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    1475-2875-8-150.pdf (265.5Kb)
    Date
    2009-07-07
    Author
    Okumu, Fredros O
    Titus, Emmanuel
    Mbeyela, Edgar
    Killeen, Gerry F
    Moore, Sarah J
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abstract Background Gold-standard tests of mosquito repellents involve exposing human volunteers to host-seeking mosquitoes, to assess the protective efficacy of the repellents. These techniques are not exposure-free and cannot be performed prior to toxicological evaluation. It is postulated that synthetic lures could provide a useful assay that mimics in-vivo conditions for use in high-throughput screening for mosquito repellents. Methods This paper reports on a semi-field evaluation of repellents using a synthetic blend of human derived attractants for the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto Different concentrations of known repellents, N, N diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and Para-methane-3, 8, diol (PMD) were added into traps baited with the synthetic blend, and resulting changes in mosquito catches were measured. Results All test concentrations of deet (0.001% to 100%) reduced the attractiveness of the synthetic blend. However, PMD was repellent only at 0.25%. Above this concentration, it significantly increased the attractiveness of the blend. There was no relationship between the repellent concentrations and the change in mosquito catches when either deet (r2 = 0.033, P = 0.302) or PMD (r2 = 0.020, P = 0.578) was used. Conclusion It is concluded that while some repellents may reduce the attractiveness of synthetic human odours, others may instead increase their attractiveness. Such inconsistencies indicate that even though the synthetic attractants may provide exposure-free and consistent test media for repellents, careful selection and multiple-repellent tests are necessary to ascertain their suitability for use in repellent screening. The synthetic odour blend tested here is not yet sufficiently refined to serve as replacement for humans in repellent testing, but may be developed further and evaluated in different formats for exposure free repellent testing purposes.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-150
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/14751
    Collections
    • Biomed Full Text Articles [188]

    UoN Digital Archive copyright © 2002-2015  Library Department
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    UoN Digital Archive copyright © 2002-2015  Library Department
    Contact Us | Send Feedback