• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluation of crop cover and residue management C factors for cropping systems and management techniquesin the semi-arid region of Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ABSTRACT28.pdf (8.191Kb)
    Date
    1989
    Author
    A.M, Kilewe
    J.P, Mbuvi
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    The mean crop cover and residue management C factor for maize with conventional tillage, maize with minimum tillage, maize intercropped with beans on alternate rows, beans alone, and maize with 3 t ha -1 of maize residue were0.77,0.45,0.44,0.3O and 0.15 respectively, as measured in two groups of subsequent rainy seasons. The high C factor for maize with conventional tillage was aitributed to low planting density for maize and slow groundlover development that provided very minimal soil protection against raindrop impact. Maize was therefore considered extremely prone to soil erosion when grown, in monoculture. The high planting density and fast ground cover development achieved by beans alone in the eaily part of the season resulted in a very low C factor. The cultivation of beans was therefore recommended as a suitable agronomic resource rnanagement system in this region either in monoculture or intercropping with erosion prone crops like maize. Mulching at the rate of 3 t ha-I of maize residue produced the lowest C factor. This was attributed to the effect of maize residue mulch that provided over 50% ground cover right from the beginning of the season rylen frequency of erosive storms is high. However, due to the scarcity and high demand for crop residue to feed livestock, mulching was not considered a feasible recommendation in cropping systems using artificial fertiliser inputs unless the mulch could be obtained from agroforestry systems using no or very little artificial fertiliser.
    URI
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11790
    Citation
    Kenya lournal of Sciences Series B (1989) 10(1-2): 75-82
    Publisher
    Kenya Agricultural Research Institute
     
    Department Of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology, University of Nairobi
     
    Subject
    Crop cover
    Residue management
    Cropping systems
    Semi-arid region of Kenya
    Collections
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM) [5481]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback