A review of indications for removal of the eye at Kenyatta national hospital

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Said, Hussein

Type

Thesis

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Nairobi

Type

Thesis

Abstract

Background: Life threatening conditions such as ocular malignancies are main reasons for removal of the eyes, other reasons include: ocular trauma and endophthalmitis. This removal of the eyes can have significant impact on a person’s body image and his or her role in the society. The devastating effect of removal may result in monocular and/or binocular blindness. There is no current data in Kenyatta National Hospital since the last study was done two and a half decades ago (1986) and a lot has changed since then in terms of better diagnostic services and management. Objective: To determine the indications for removal of the eye at Kenyatta National Hospital. Methodology: The study was a retrospective case series carried out at Kenyatta National Hospital to identify patients who underwent eye removal procedures between September 2002 and September 2012. Basic demographic data, diagnosis, the eye affected, visual acuity at diagnosis and eye removal procedure performed were extracted from the patient’s file and recorded in questionnaires. Descriptive analysis was used to assess indicators for eye removal while the agreement between diagnostics was compared using kappa statistics. All the analyses were done using STATA version 11. Results: A total of 261 patients’ files were reviewed during the study period and 281 eyes were analyzed. The majority (129) were under 10 years of age (49.42%) with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. The most common type of surgery done was enucleation in 141 (50.18%), followed by exenteration in 89 (31.67%) and evisceration in 52 (18.51%). The most common indication for eye removal was retinoblastoma (42.35%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (25.27%) and the least was phthisis bulbi (0.38%). The agreement between clinical and histopathological diagnosis was high at 93.10% (95%CI: 87.52-94.64; kappa value=0.83, P<0.001). Conclusion: Tumors were still the commonest indications of eye removal at Kenyatta National while painful blind eye and phthisis bulbi are now rarely considered for removal of eyes. All specimens should be taken for histology irrespective of what the clinical diagnosis was.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Masters in Medicine (Ophthalmology)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By