Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKariuki, Muigua
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-16T06:29:04Z
dc.date.available2017-03-16T06:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/100551
dc.description.abstractThis paper critically discusses the investor-state dispute settlement and other aspects of investment treaties or agreements that are likely to defeat the original purpose of BITs, that is, promoting trade and investment for national development for both the domestic and host states. The discussion is mainly in the context of developing world and focuses on the main aspects that negotiators should look out for in order to ensure that such treaties facilitate trade and investment in a mutual way between contracting states, especially where the host country is from the developing world.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titleNegotiating dispute settlement terms in bilateral investment treaties (bits) and economic partnership agreements (epas)en_US
dc.typePresentationen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States