dc.description.abstract | Competitive strategy is a long-term action plan of a particular firm in order to outperform
its rivals and gain market leadership. This entails identifying assets of competition inside
the chaotic surroundings thereafter developing strategies that suit organizational skills to
the modifications within the surroundings. Competitive advantage is composed of the
maneuvers, tactics and procedures a company has and is employing to draw customers,
resist competitive stress and enhance its market position. The research objectives were to
determine the competitive strategies adopted by construction firms in Kisumu County
and establish the influence of the competitive strategies on firm performance. This study
was based on Game Theory and Strategic Conflicts model. The study used cross sectional
descriptive survey design. Target population was composed of 200 listed resident
construction companies operating in Kisumu County. A random sampling technique was
employed to select 134 respondents who were determined using Yamane formula. A
structured questionnaire was used to collect primary data. Descriptive statistics and
inferential statistics were used to analyze data. The study established that the construction
firms in Kisumu County adopted competitive strategies which include; cost leadership
which was achieved by offering competitive prices among others, product differentiation
which was achieved by the reputation of the firm products, growth strategies which
include a strong brand, expanding and opening branches in other regions, grand strategies
which was achieved by adoption of new building technologies and embracing business
integration with other firms. The study findings established that firm performance was
significantly influenced by the three generic strategies (cost leadership, differentiation
and focus). Further, out of the four growth strategies studied, the findings revealed that
market penetration and market development were the only strategies that significantly
affected firm performance. However, grand strategies had three strategies namely; joint
venture, innovation and strategic alliance that influenced firm performance significantly.
The findings also showed grand strategies had significant effect on all the tested five
performance indicators, whereas generic strategies significantly influenced learning and
growth and environmental safety and corporate social responsibility. The study findings
equally established that growth strategies had significant influence on the following three
performance indicators; financial performance, customer satisfaction and environmental
safety and corporate social responsibility. The research findings showed that three broad
strategies: generic strategies, growth strategies and grand strategies had statistically
significant influence on firm performance. The findings also revealed that the most
predictor variable was the generic strategies followed by grand strategies and the least
was growth strategies. The research therefore deduced that competitive strategies have
influence on firm performance and therefore advise firms to adopt competitive strategies.
Arising from the study findings, the researcher proposes the following areas for further
study: There is a particular need for further study establishing factors affecting the
embracing and execution of competitive strategies within the construction industry in
Kisumu County. Also a further research should be undertaken to identify the influence of
competitive strategies on performance of resident construction companies in other
counties and compare the results. | en_US |