Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAl-Absi, ES
dc.contributor.authorAl-Sadeq, DW
dc.contributor.authorYounis, MH
dc.contributor.authorYassine, HM
dc.contributor.authorAbdalla, OM
dc.contributor.authorMesleh, AG
dc.contributor.authorHadwan, TA
dc.contributor.authorAmimo, JO
dc.contributor.authorThalib, L
dc.contributor.authorNasrallah, GK
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-30T08:16:03Z
dc.date.available2018-07-30T08:16:03Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30051802
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/103503
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Although hepatitis E virus (HEV) is mainly transmitted via the faecal-oral route, the rate of HEV transmission via blood donation is on the rise. However, the seroprevalence of HEV among blood donors is not well established and is thought to be affected by the type of diagnostic assay used. We aimed to evaluate performance and correlation among widely used commercial diagnostic assays for the seroprevalence assessment of HEV-IgM/IgG among blood donors. METHODOLOGY: A total of 1049 blood donor samples were tested for HEV IgG and IgM using different enzyme immunoassays (Wantai, Eruoimmune, MP diagnostics, Mikrogen immunoblot, HEV-IgM rapid test). The performance of each assay was evaluated according to our established silver standard value based on three or more IgG concordant assay results. RESULTS: HEV seroprevalence varied considerably using these assays, ranging from 10.1 % (Euroimmune-ELISA) to 18.0 % (Wanti-ELISA) for HEV-IgG, and from 0.2 % (Wanti-ELISA) to 2.6 % (MP Rapid test) for HEV-IgM. A total of 155 of 216 (71.6%) samples tested positive for HEV-IgG by three or more concordant assays. On the other hand, IgM assays showed poor agreement as only 7.6 % (4/52) of the specimens were positive according to three or more concordant assay test results. All HEV-IgG assays revealed high sensitivity and specificity (ranging 96.5-100 %),and excellent Kappa concordance (0.88-0.95), except for Euroimmun ELISA (sensitivity=61.5 %, kappa=0.63). MP ELISA showed the highest levels of sensitivity (100 %) and specificity (98.5 %). CONCLUSIONS: Due to discrepancies in the performance of various IgG and IgM assays, seroprevalence studies should be based on furher confirmatory testing for decisive conclusions to be reached.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titlePerformance evaluation of five commercial assays in assessing seroprevalence of HEV antibodies among blood donors.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States