Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuballa, T
dc.contributor.authorHausler, T
dc.contributor.authorOkaru, AO
dc.contributor.authorNeufeld, M
dc.contributor.authorAbuga, KO
dc.contributor.authorKibwage, IO
dc.contributor.authorRehm, J
dc.contributor.authorLuy, B
dc.contributor.authorWalch, SG
dc.contributor.authorLachenmeier, DW
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T08:12:45Z
dc.date.available2018-07-31T08:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citation10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.065en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29287330
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/103584
dc.description.abstractBeverage fraud involving counterfeiting of brand spirits is an increasing problem not only due to deception of the consumer but also because it poses health risks e.g. from possible methanol admixture. Suspicious spirit samples from Russia and Kenya were analysed using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in comparison to authentic products. Using linear regression analysis of spectral integral values, 4 counterfeited samples from Russia and 2 from Kenya were easily identifiable with R2 < 0.7. Sensory analysis using triangle test methodology confirmed significant taste differences between counterfeited and authentic samples but the assessors were unable to correctly identify the counterfeited product in the majority of cases. An important conclusion is that consumers cannot assumed to be self-responsible when consuming counterfeit alcohol because there is no general ability to organoleptically detect counterfeit alcohol.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectAcetic acid (PubChem CID: 176); Brand spirits; Citric acid (PubChem CID: 311); Counterfeit; Ethanol (PubChem CID: 702); Glycerol (PubChem CID: 753); Methanol (PubChem CID: 887); NMR fingerprints; Sensory analysisen_US
dc.titleDetection of counterfeit brand spirits using 1H NMR fingerprints in comparison to sensory analysis.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States