dc.description.abstract | Ownership structure leads to agency problems since majority shareholders have high levels of incentives hence they monitor the actions of the management and influence decisions. There has been a growing debate on whether ownership structure impacts on management decisions especially dividend policy decisions. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ownership on dividend pay-out of listed firms at Nairobi Securities Exchange. The study employed correlation analysis and panel regression analysis in establishing relationship between types of ownership structures and dividend pay-out. This research was anchored by agency theory and utilized a cross-sectional descriptive research design. The population comprised of 67 listed firms as at 31st December, 2017 that were operational in the study period. Secondary sources of data spanning for a period between 2012 and 2016 were used. Diagnostic tests and descriptive statistics were carried out afterwards inferential statistics: correlation analysis and regression analysis were applied in hypothesis testing. The study found that dividend pay-out and firm profitability increased rapidly over the study period. Debt and firm size recorded a gradual increase while ownership structures (institutional, managerial, state and foreign) recorded a slow increase over the study period. There lacked any correlation amongst ownership structures (institutional, managerial, state and foreign) and dividend pay-out. Likewise, there lacked any correlation amongst ROA, debt, firm size with dividend pay-out. Regression outcome found that coefficient of determination was 6.6%, implying that the regression model used was a poor predictor. However, analysis of variance was 0.0063; implying that it was statistically significant. Firm profitability, firm size and institutional ownership were related positively to dividend pay-out while debt was negatively related. Institutional ownership, debt and firm profitability were found to be insignificant while firm size was significant. | en_US |