Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeter, M.F. Mbithi
dc.contributor.authorJerry V, Bailey
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-25T10:05:26Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifier.citationBull. Anim. Hlth. Prod. Afr. (1991),39,93-96en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11149
dc.description.abstractThe healing of untreated and Nitrofurazone bandage treated excisionalskin wounds on the metatarsal and/or metacarpal regions of cows was compared. There was no difference in the rate of wound healing and epithelization between the untreated and treated wounds healing and epithelialization between the untreated and treated wounds (P<O.OS). but contraction was greater in the treated wounds (P>O.OS). The untreated wounds did not produce exuberant granulation tissue and healed with thick firm scars. The treated wounds grew excessive granulation tissue and healed with thin friable scars that were very easily disrupted. Results suggested that skin lacerations on the distal limbs of healthy cattle do not benefit from topical antibiosis and or bandaging.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectNitrofurazoneen
dc.subjectExcisional skin woundsen
dc.subjectCattleen
dc.titleComparative healing of nitrofurazone bandage treated and untreated excisional skin wounds in cattleen
dc.title.alternativeComparaison de la guerison des blessures dues a l'excision de la peau, traitees et non-traitees au nitrofurazone avec du bandage chez les bovinsen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Clinical Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobien
local.publisherDepartment of Veterinary Anaesthesiology, Radiology and Surgery, Western College of Veterinary Medicine Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N OWOen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record