Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMomanyi, Evanson K N
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-28T11:34:52Z
dc.date.issued2012-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/12350
dc.description.abstractThis research study sought to find out whether KPRL met its performance improvement objective by implementing BPR in asset management system and the challenges it faced which constrained its improvement. The findings were based on both secondary and primary data. Secondary data was collected from KPRL records covering six months pre- and post- BPR implementation. This was the data available for post BPR implementation when the research study was started. The consideration was for a single item transaction case with the initiator being a technician level employee and approval up to the supervisor level only. Cost consideration was for the initiator expenses exclusive of all other transaction associated costs. Primary data was obtained through interview where an interview guide was used to collect data on BPR implementation challenges. Seven informants were targeted to enable data capture for all the sections and categories involved in asset management. They included; one engineering head of department, one engineering supervisor, one mechanical technician, one instrument technician, one electrical technician, one materials clerk and one contracts clerk. The study found out that by implementing BPR in asset management, KPRL drastically improved its materials approval process time by achieving a ten times reduction resulting in an eleven times reduction in cost too as the two were noted to move in tandem. The cost consideration represented part of the cost saving in the process and the full consideration would result in a much high saving. v The study also found out that BPR implementation comes with a lot of challenges which impacts the improvement achieved. On the part of KPRL out of the many challenges considered, all came out with a significance rating of medium and above with medium representing 57% and above representing 43%. The biggest challenge experienced by KPRL was on communication of the project importance within the organization which was rated high. Generally for any BPR undertaking, reasonable improvement levels can only be achieved when all challenges are managed to the desired levelen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.subjectbusiness process reengineeringen
dc.subjectperformance improvementen
dc.subjectcase studyen
dc.subjectkenya petroleum refineries limiteden
dc.titleBusiness process reengineering for performance improvement: a case study of kenya petroleum refineries limiteden
dc.typeThesisen
local.embargo.terms6 monthsen
local.publisherSchool Of Business, University Of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record