Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOtele, OM
dc.contributor.authorEtyang, Oita
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-19T07:38:40Z
dc.date.available2022-09-19T07:38:40Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.identifier.citationThe African Review: A Journal of African Politics, Development and International Affairs, Vol. 42, No. 1 (2015), pp. 29-57en_US
dc.identifier.issnhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45341694
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/161381
dc.description.abstractSince the return of multipartyism, Africa has seen the proliferation of political parties as vehicles for political contestation. Consequently, this has triggered curiosity among scholars to ask one main question: Are they institutionalized? Using cases from former Anglophone countries; this article offers a comparative assessment of party institutionalization in Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Zambia. Although Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria and Zambia epitomize weak levels of party institutionalization, Ghana comes nearest to party institutionalizing based on Randall and Svasand model. It is our supposition that most parties in Africa have failed to institutionalize and this has hampered the performance of political parties in consolidating the ideals of democracy. On the strength of the evidence from Ghana, we contend that there is need for political party renaissance in Africa to help them play their envisaged roles in democracy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrillen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.titleParty Institutionalization in Africa: Kenya's 2013 Elections in Comparative Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States