Landmarks from El Mann to the Saitoti Ruling: Searching a Philosophy of Constitutional Interpretation in Kenya

dc.contributor.author	Thiankolu, Muthomi
dc.date.accessioned	2013-04-25T13:31:38Z
dc.date.available	2013-04-25T13:31:38Z
dc.date.issued	2007
dc.identifier.citation	Landmarks from El Mann to the Saitoti Ruling; Searching a Philosophy of Constitutional Interpretation in Kenya, Thiankolu, M. , Kenya Law Review, Volume 1, (2007) copy at http://profiles.uonbi.ac.ke/thiankolu/publications/landmarks-el-mann-saitoti-ruling-searching-philosophy-constitutional-interpre	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://ssrn.com/abstract=1601306
dc.identifier.uri	http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/16850
dc.description.abstract	This paper reviews constitutional interpretation in Kenya. The basic argument is that a judge's inclination to a particular theory of law can affect, and invariably affects, the outcome of constitutional litigation. It concludes, among other things, that the Kenyan High Court has failed to establish a consistent theory or approach to constitutional interpretation.	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Kenya Law Review,;Vol. 1, pp. 188-213, 2007
dc.subject	Constitution, constitutional interpretation, jurisprudence, fundamental rights and freedoms	en
dc.title	Landmarks from El Mann to the Saitoti Ruling: Searching a Philosophy of Constitutional Interpretation in Kenya	en
dc.type	Article	en