Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShivonje, M F
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-08T10:36:00Z
dc.date.available2013-05-08T10:36:00Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationMaster of Science in Soil Scienceen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/20263
dc.description.abstractSUI face Crusts restrict water infiltration into soil. Upon drying the surface Crust may impede plant emergence and growth. thereby reducing yield. This study was carried out with the aim of assessing the effect of cumulative rainfall. surface roughness decay and slope gradient on Crust properties with a view of developing relationships between crust formation. surface roughness and slope gradient when soil is subjected to natural rainfall. A surface layer (0-20 em) of a chromic Luvisol was filled into wooden boxes (1x1xO.3 rn) and arranged at an open site in a completely randomised design. The Soil was exposed to rainfall at four slope gradients (1%, 10%. 20% and 30%) for two rain seasons. Surface rouqhness, crust thickness, crust strength and crust conductance were measured under various cumulative rainfall amounts. Thick and strong crusts were observed at the soil surface after the first rainfall event. Crust thickness and strength were significantly different (P<0.05) between slope gradients, with crust formation being more pronounced at lower slope gradients (1% and 10 %) compared to higher slope gradients (20% and 30%). Both crust thickness and crust strength followed a similar trend; as cumulative rainfall increased, they showed a slight increase after 2-3 storms, followed by a gradual decline as rainfall increased. Crust conductance was reduced by between 60'/'0 and 80% after the first rainfall event, and increased thereafter as the surface crust continued to decay with rainfall increase. Crust conductance was more strongly correlated to crust thickness (r=-0.84) than to crust strength (1=-0.54) Saturated hydraulic conductivity of the crust correlated well with crust thickness (r=-0.57) and crust strength (1'=-0.65). Random roughness decay was weakly correlated to crust strength (r=0.40), crust thickness (r=0.54), and crust conductance (r=-0.44) The rate of surface roughness decay under rainfall was qreater at lower slope gradients (1% and 10%) than at higher slope gradients (20% and 30(1"0). The first rainfall event had the greatest effect on crust formation and the decay of surface roughness at all the four slope gradients 'The study concluded that Crusting occurs early in the rainfall season on freshly ploughed soil and that crusting severity increases as the slope gradient decreases. Therefore the study recommended that more care should be taken on flat to gently sloping land than to steep land as far as soil crusting is concerned. Also, the soil requires a surface cover early in the rainfall season until adequate canopy cover develops However, the recommendations made in this study should be adopted bearing in mind that the rainfall used in the study was from a semi-humid area and not from the semi-arid area from where the soil samples were obtained.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleThe effect of random roughness decay, slope gradient and cumulative rainfall in crust formation on chromic luvisolsen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherDepartment of Soil Science,en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record