Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMutisya, Juliana N
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-10T12:21:13Z
dc.date.available2013-05-10T12:21:13Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationMasters of business administrationen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/21371
dc.description.abstractCorporate governance is the system through which corporations are directed and controlled. On the other hand, the main goal of companies is to maximise the wealth of shareholders. With the recent problems across the world for example the collapse of major corporations like Enron, the impact of corporate practises has increased profoundly. Public companies are issuing more and more of their shares to the public as they seek to expand. Governments are also reducing their control in state owned corporations through the sale of their shareholding to the public. With such growth in the amount of control being relinquished to the public, the public in return demand better governance of their corporations. With the Cadbury Report of 1992, the GECD principles of corporate governance of 1999 and close home, the CMA guidelines on corporate governance, there is a benchmark that companies are required to follow. This gives stakeholders an opportunity to judge if their companies are being run according to the set guidelines. The methodology comprised running a multivariate regression model. The dependent variable, company performance was measured using two measures. The Return on Investment (ROI) and the Market to Book Value (MBV). The independent variables included, the board size, the proportion of outside directors, the proportion of inside directors, average age of the directors, the number of meetings held by the board in a year, the proportion of shares held by directors, proportion of shares held by the top shareholder, the proportion of shares held by the top ten (10) shareholders and the number of women in the board. The general expectation was that there would be a positive relationship between profitability and the aspects of corporate governance indicated above. Also investigated were the ages of chairpersons, their' professions and number of chairmanships held. The study covered the period between 2000 to~2005. The regression model showed that 4.3% of the changes in profitability were accounted for by the aspects of corporate governance studied when profitability was measured using the ROI and 22% when profitability was measured using the Market to Book Value. Board size, number of meetings in a year and the proportion of shares held by the top directors were the most significant variables in the model. The number of women sitting on corporate boards was found to be very small, just 2% comparing well with Japan but not the rest of the world.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Nairobien
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleA study of the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance of companies listed on the Nairobi stock exchangeen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherSchool of business,University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record