Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWanjiru, Rose
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-11T09:55:58Z
dc.date.available2013-05-11T09:55:58Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationMasters of business administrationen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/21910
dc.description.abstractThis report presents the findings of a survey on the factors that affect the productivity of credit officers in Micro finance Institutions. The research was conducted in four of the leading MFls that use the replica of Grameen model for providing credit to micro and small businesses. These model uses solidarity groups to facilitate provision of small loans to clients without collateral. From best practice credit officers are expected to handle a range of between 300 to 500 active clients. From the findings of this study, most of the credit officers handle less than 300 active clients. This could be explained by the economic situation in the country whereby most credit clients are fearful of taking up loans because their businesses are not doing well. Because of the low client base the researcher used the mean value from the sample which was 230 active clients to differentiate the more from the less productive cas. It was noted that most of the COs had the expected average portfolio per client of Ksh.30,000. This signifies that they are serving the MSEs. A productivity index for rating each the COs was developed using i) number of active clients; ii) the average number of loans falling into arrears; iii) the average number of defaulters; and iv) number of clients leaving the groups. The measures were given the weights of 0.6, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.1 respectively. The first measure had the highest weight since it is the one that is recommended according to best practise. However, productivity cannot be taken at face value in a complex economy since there are several unattractive or negative outputs, which counter good output. For this reason, the researcher used the latter three measures to control or gauge the main output measure. The six independent factors in the study were found to have a 9% effect on the productivity of the COs. The factor found to be most significant was experience. The COs with more experience were found to be more productive - the saying "experience is the best teacher" really applies. Education was not found to have any significant effect on productivity. The COs had either college diploma or university degree and the findings indicated that there was no difference in the productivity of COs regardless of their education level. It was observed that one organisation was at expansion stage and had many new COs. These COs had very few groups and seemed to be doing promotion and mobilisation. For any organisation in an expansion stage, it is expected that its output or productivity to be low due to the new systems and staff are being employed. This being an exploratory study there are many issues it has raised that need further research. An issue at hand is the education or qualification requirements of the credit officers. The other issue is the geographical coverage as most COs are concentrated in the same area and competition challenges have made them less productive.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Nairobien
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleFactors that influence the productivity of credit officers in microfinance institutionsen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherSchool of business,University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record