Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMulei, Albert N
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-15T06:08:48Z
dc.date.available2013-05-15T06:08:48Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationA Management Research Project Report Submitted in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements of the Degree of Masters of Business Administration (MBA), School Of Business, University Of Nairobien
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/22744
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed at determining effectiveness of various positioning strategies on customer choice in the detergent industry in Kenya. The study was grounded on the detergents market and it sought to determine primarily how the detergent consumption choice had been impacted on by the positioning strategies adopted by the various detergent brand sponsors, and also evaluate possible responses to other positioning strategies not yet adopted in the detergent market. The rationale for the study was to derive knowledge and provide evidence in order of importance of the choice criteria of consumers towards detergents and how this related to the various positioning strategies adopted by the detergent brand sponsors. The answers to the study would by extension answer the brand sponsors dilemma on which positioning strategies to use to get favorable consumer choice. The objectives of the study were to determine the effectiveness of various positioning strategies on consumer choice and to rank the various positioning strategies based on level of importance in influencing consumer choice. The population of interest was the Nairobi middle class estates chosen to eliminate influence of price in Brand choice. Segmentation and choice of sample population was based on perceived income levels and by social class with average house rent rate being an indicator of the class level. The sample population consisted of 1-0-0 respondents segmented into three income segments based on rent levels. The distribution of the respondents in the sample population segments were 36 respondents in the lower middle, 34 respondents in the middle -middle and 30 respondents in the upper middle. A list of Nairobi residential estates with rent levels within the segments of upper middle, middle and lower middle income ( see appendix IV and appendix V) were identified and used to select the sample population. Ten estates were selected randomly from each segment and households were then selected from each selected estate. The stratified random sampling was done such that each of the estates got an equal chance of being selected. The respondents were selected using a recruitment guideline (see appendix VI) . A structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. The method of collection was personal visits and interview with the research assistant. The questionnaires were screened, coded and edited for completeness using SPSS statistical package. The data was cross-tabulated, ranked and correlated to derive the research findings. Positioning by product benefit was found to be the most important positioning strategy in influencing consumer choice. Positioning by competitor ranked amongst the least important positioning, with number one detergent and better than others, ranking amongst the least important in influencing consumer choice. These findings support why product benefit positioning is widely used in detergent industry and gives credence to Aaker (1996) assertion that the most used positioning strategy as the association of an object with the product characteristic or customer benefit. The second most effective positioning strategies were based on price quality value positioning which is positioning by price strategy. Positioning by price quality value is very effective in influencing consumer choice scoring a median rank of 2, which is very effective in influencing Consumer choice. Economy in use, which is positioning strategy based on product usage, was the third most effective positioning strategy in influencing consumer choice on the broader positioning strategies. Product attribute positioning strategies like positioning by product colour and positioning by sweet smelling perfume were considered only as effective in influencing consumer choice whereas, another product attribute positioning by using presence of special ingredients and of enzymes was considered as least effective in influencing consumer choice. Positioning by competitor by directly making comparisons in this case positioning by claiming to be better than others was found to be least effective in influencing consumer purchase. Positioning by product user was found to be least effective in influencing consumer use scoring a median of 4. However this finding could be skewed by the fact that few people admit to be influenced by others in making their decisions. Products which have already built strong relation with the consumer on stain removal, color care and gentleness on fabric should maintain their positioning on these fronts and avoid migrating their positioning to non effective positions such as positioning on competitor and positioning on product attributes There was no significant correlation between the consumer's income and the effectiveness of various positioning strategies in influencing consumer choice VIII which implied that the findings of the research can be replicated in the upper and lower income population without significant changes in findings. The research has successfully explored the effectiveness of positioning strategies on consumer choice in the detergent market within the limitations of time and cost. Similar studies should be conducted in the mobile phones, paints, beverage; cosmetics, Toothpaste, banking and other industries to get a broader appreciation of how various positioning strategies influence consumer choice.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleEvaluation of the effectiveness of positioning strategies on consumer choiceen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherBusiness Administrationen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record