Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRatemo, Zachariah M
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-15T06:10:43Z
dc.date.available2013-05-15T06:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2004-11
dc.identifier.citationMasters Of Business Administration (MBA) Degree, University of Nairobien
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/22745
dc.descriptionA management research project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Masters of Business Administration, Faculty of Commerce, University of Nairobien
dc.description.abstractThe micro finance sector in Kenya has grown rapidly in the last ten years. The sector has grown out of necessity primarily to provide financial services to the micro-economy, comprising all segments of the rural and urban population, including small scale farmers, microentrepreneurs, women and the poor. The sector has grown largely through the support of development organizations in which the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is among the leading donor agencies. This case study is to examine the factors that influence the USAID MFI development strategy, the expectations of the USAID- supported MFIs and a comparison of the USAID - MFI expectations. The study had three objectives: 1. Establish how USAID's expectations influence its MFI development strategy for the sector in Kenya. 2. Identify the expectations/perceptions of MFIs supported by USAID. 3. Establish a comparison of USAID and MFI expectations. Data was collected through questionnaires administered personally and circulated to MFIs. Both closed and open-ended questions were used. Data was collected from 7 USAID officials and 7 MFIs that have been directly funded by USAID over the last ten years. Secondary data was also used in the analysis. Basic statistical analysis such as frequency distribution, simple and cross tabulations, proportions and percentages were used. A content analysis was also carried out. USAID has an MFI development strategy that shows that the future of microfinance lies not with limited donor funds, but with the private sector. In other words, microfinance services should become part of the country's private financial system in order to be sustainable. The strategy is highly influenced by pre-determined expectations that have been jointly agreed upon by many donor agencies through the Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP). The results also show that MFIs have the same expectations as donors and no major standing out controversy was noted in the study. On the part of MFIs, there is a general consensus that if they are to grow enough to reach, on a long-term basis, the millions of low income people without access to financial services, they need access to more sustainable sources of finance to support their development. These will have to include private sources of debt and equity and savings. There is still a role for donors in further development of the microfinance industry in Kenya to address a number of constraints including lack of capital for on-lending and institutional capacity of MFIs. In spite of the sustainability and even profits that have been reported by MFIs, there are few signs that the micro finance industry in Kenya has evolved into a real business that will grow and reach more low-income people without subsidy, whether it is given by foreign donor agencies, national governments or charities. This is partly because microfinance is still perceived as subsidy-dependent activity, and the continuing flow of donor funds 'crowd-out' profit seeking finance. The study shows that there is little sign that start-up capital is flowing to micro finance. The MFIs' intentions and strategy of less reliance on donor funding will be tested over time. The enactment of the Microfinance legislation to allow qualifying MFls mobilize deposits from the public is absolutely necessary. The Bill should be enacted without delay. Savings is a viable source of capital for on-lending purposes to many MFls that are presently registered as NGOs or finance companies. In addition, the Microfinance legislation will enable MFls develop other financial services that are appropriate for the majority of the rural population. A policy and regulatory framework for MFls and pro-poor programs is required. The policy framework will address a number of issues about pro-poor financial services and programs such as awareness and education, establishment of appropriate support institutional framework such as an MFI fund to support the industry, establishing a legal framework that ensures that courts are effective in the collection of debts.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID) strategy for the development of MFIs in Kenya and the expectations of funded institutionsen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherSchool of Businessen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record