Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNdege, Peter O
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-16T13:58:02Z
dc.date.available2013-05-16T13:58:02Z
dc.date.issued1987-07
dc.identifier.citationMasters of Arts , University of Nairobi (1987)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/23657
dc.description.abstractThis is a study of economic change of Kasipul and Kabondo between 1800 and 1962. The study employs the concepts of mode of production and articulation as its theoretical framework. These concepts have only recently become popular in social studies in general, and historical analyses, in particular. They are relevant to the understanding of the dynamics of change because they help us pose questions about the relationship between the forces and relations of production, and about the way the material base and the superstructure interact. These are questions which are easily ignored or overlooked by approaches that are based on the theories of 'modernization and underdevelopment. The use of mode of production and articulation is based on the belief that history is a dialectical process in which change is a culmination of contradictions and internal tension within any given situation. In pre-colonial Kasipul and Kabondo contradictions and tensions within the 'lineage mode of production led to the segmentation of large lineages, migrations and the setting up of new lineages. Changes in the environment that were consequent upon the settlement of new areas, also led to the development of new technology and means of material existence and changes in political organization. These changes were exemplified by the transition from a predominantly pastoral economy, to which the people of Kasipul and Kabondo were accustomed In the eighteenth century, to a mixed economy in which crop cultivation was dominant, by the end of the nineteenth century. During the colonial period, the colonial state played a major role in incorporating the Kasipul and Kabondo economy into world cap it alism . It did this through political conquest and the establishment of a repressive administration. This led to the loss of political independence by the indigenous people. It also defined the political parameters within which the colonial capitalist economy was established and influenced the responses of the local people. The colonial state also established a system of taxation which was aimed at the collection of revenue for financing general administration and also for drawing the local people into the capitalist economy. Useful in the saciaIization of the local people into the colonial world was Western education, established mainly by the Christian missionaries. The new system of education emphasized salvation from 'traditional' culture, obedience to God and the colonial government, and work in the colonial economy. A more direct assault on the indigenous economy by the colonial state was the introduction and development of commodity production and wage labour, and also, the extension of the market. To achieve these and to serve the needs of capitalism the colonial state partially dissolved and restructured the indigenous economy. The responses of the people of Kasipul and Kabondo were also crucial in the development of the colonial economy. In their responses the local people considered the economic advantages of participating in the colonial econorny . With in the Colonial economy they considered the advantages and disadvantages of participating in alternative economic activities: commodity production, wage labour and trade. But all these considerations and subsequent choices were ma dc within the context of the colonial: situation. They in the end, determined the extent of people's participation in, and the development of, the colonial economy in the area. The establishment and development of the colonial economy had a number of consequences in Kasipul and Kabondo. For instance, it brought about changes in forces of production as new crops, tools and techniques of production were introduced. It also led to changes in relations of production as it created new needs among the people, and established new relations of exploitation between individuals and between individual families and capital. Further) it resulted in a new process of socio-economic differentiationen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi.en
dc.titleEconomic Change In Kasipul And Kabondo, 1800-1962en
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherDepartment of Artsen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record