Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuniafu, M M
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-22T06:50:17Z
dc.date.available2013-05-22T06:50:17Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifier.citationMScen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/24309
dc.descriptionMaster of Science (Botany)en
dc.description.abstractSeeds of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv GLP2 were sown in two plots over two dry seasons; January to March and July to September 1990. A line source sprinkler system was used to supply and control the amount of water received by the crop. During the first season the high and low water treatments, received 699.6 mm and 421.5 mm of water respectively. Reference crop evaporation was 329.3 mm over the season. During the second season the high treatment received 255.7 mm of water while the low water treatment received 123.8 mm and Etq was 210.8 mm. Measurements bf dry weight, leaf area and radiation ,, were made after everyone week. Soil moisture levels were measured-over the season at depths of 10cm, 30cm and later, 50cm as the roots grew deeper. Leaf area in many cases was significantly different at p<0.05 between treatments for both seasons. SoiL moisture levels during the first season were significantly different at almost all depths between 33 days after sowing (DAS) and 70 DAS. For the second 'season there was significant difference from 37 DAS upto the end of -the season with only one exception. Differences in dry weight between treatments increased with time in both seasons and generally, plants of the low water treatment absorbed less PAR than those of the high water treatment in both seasons. Photosynthetic efficiency, e, was estimated as a regression of the dry matter accumulated over the growing season upon the cumulative GR intercepted and PAR absorbed over the same time period and those based on PAR converted into a dimensionless energy term. The economic efficiencies were calculated using only the economically important part of the plant (.i.e the final dry seed) as ratios of the final seed-weight per metre squared to the total GR intercepted and PAR absorbed over the season. Those for PAR absorbed were also expressed as a dimensionless energy term. Photosynthetic efficiency was also estimated as a product of the proportion of incident PAR absorbed (e.••) and the photochemical efficiency with which the absorbed PAR is converted into dry matter for three growth stages in each of the two seasons. a drop in pho\osynthetic efficiency of about 20% in the low water treatment for both seasons (in terms of the dimensionless eaer9.Y term) while for the economic efficiency, the drop was about 20% and 501. for the first and second seasonsYespectively. The yield in the first season decreased by 21% in the low water treatment compared to the high water treatment. The average final seed-weight for the treatments were 12.9 g/plant and 15.8 g/plant respectively. In the second season the average yield decreased by 42% In the low water treatment. The method of estimating e values from the components and differed from that of regression in that the former was based on incident PAR and on growth stages and a different grouping of dry matter accumulation and radiation. Differences of efficiencies calculated differently are explained in the text. An investigation of the performance of PAR sensors, i .e. the tube solarimeters and a line quantum sensor, showed that each tube solarimeter under-read the line quantum sensor by the same amount irrespective of its orientation. Yield in beans under water stress is confirmed to be reduced through a decreased assimilatory leaf area leading to a decline in the amount of PAR absorbed as ,, well as by a reduced rate of photosynthesis as indicated by the dr-op in" photosynthetic efficiency. The latter means that the efficiency of conversion of absorbed radiant energy into dry matter needs to be taken into consideration in the search for plant varieties suitable for growth in the marginal semi-arid areasen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleThe photosynthetic efficiency of phaseolus vulgaris L. under two soil moisture levels.en
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record