Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOmbidi, Wllkister A
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-22T08:41:40Z
dc.date.available2013-05-22T08:41:40Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationA thesis submitted to the population studies and research institute as partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of master of arts (population studies), university of Nairobien
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/24373
dc.description.abstractThis study is a build-up on the findings of other studies, censuses and surveys in Kenya whose results reveal that rural fertility has been consistently higher than that of the urban (Kangi, 1978; Omagwa, 1985; Osiemo, 1986; Ong'uti, 1987; the 1969 and 1979 National Population Censuses; KDHS 1989 and 1993; KCPS, 1984). Recent findings indicate that the country's TFR is 5.4 children per woman against the expected 3.4 (see table 1.1a), and that on average a rural woman has 5.8 children as opposed to 3.4 for her urban counterpart (NCPD etal, 1994:21). The major objective of the study was to determine the factors which contribute to urban-rural fertility differentials, then generate policy and research recommendations based on the findings. The major source of data for this study was KDHS, 1993. It was one of the latest and most detailed surveys so far conducted in Kenya. The sample size was a total of 7540 women aged 15-49 years of whom 15% lived in the urban areas while the remaining 85% were rural dwellers. A series of important socio-economic, demographic, socio-cultural and Family Planning (FP) factors formed the basis for the independent variables which included female (mothers') education, work status, marital status, age at first marriage, under-five mortality, ethnicity, religion, and access to the nearest FP service out-let in terms of time (minutes) to get to source. The dependent variable was children ever born (CEB) While contraception served as the proximate variable. The study used various statistical methods ranging from frequencies and percentages, cross tabulations with chi-square, to simple and multiple regression analysis. These techniques, while fairly easy to understand and apply, proved most comprehensive and exhaustive in producing the expected results. All the study variables were tested at 0.05 level of significance. v The study has revealed that fertility differentials exist between urban and rural areas in Kenya and that fertility is higher in the rural. As shown in table 4.1, whereas 24.4% of the rural women had 6+ children, only 9.2% of the urban women had the same number of children. Of the variables which had positive relationship with CEB, age of the mother at 35+ years had the strongest significant influence on CEB followed by under-five mortality and the married category of marital status in both urban and rural areas. Their impact was, however, generally greater in the rural suggesting higher fertility for rural women. Late age at marriage and secondary+ education were found to be the major factors in fertility reduction, but with greater influence in the urban explaining the low fertility that characterize urban areas. Contraception had reducing effect on CEB in both areas, but its depressing effect was strongest for women with secondary+ education and lived in the urban, while minimal in the rural except among the highly educated. Results indicate that against the initial purpose of spacing births, most Kenyan women tend to use contraceptives basically to terminate births after getting enough children as security against child loss, hence contraception was found more popular among women with many children. It is no wonder that under-five mortality has been singled out by this study as a barrier to success of contraception in fertility reduction attempt. Most of the independent variables considered in this study tended to have more impact in the rural areas. In the absence of proximate determinant (contraception), the variation in CEB explained by all the independent variables together was 63.9% and 72.8% respectively for urban and rural areas. Together with contraception, the variation explained rose to 65.9% in the urban and 73.4% in the rural, showing greater impact of contraception in the urban. However, demographic variables explained the bulk of the observed explained variations in CEB, 63.3% for urban and 72.3% for rural. It is an interesting finding of this study that while urban areas had the advantage of better education, ~engage at marriage, fewer incidences of child loss and limited attachment to ethnic dictates which are characteristic of low fertility, the scenario was relatively different in the rural where fertility was found higher and attributed to low level of education, greater concentration of the married and high parity women (aged 35+ years), early age at marriage, more deaths to children aged below five years, affiliation to ethnic and religious beliefs and practices, being far (60+ minutes) away· from the nearest FP outlet, and minimal use of contraception. One major conclusion that can be derived from the study results is that secondary+ education is paramount in fertility reduction. Thus, this study recommends increase in school enrolment for girls, and creation of more' employment and training opportunities in the rural areas. Further, efforts should be made to promote Reproductive Health Education in schools to enable the youth to understand the dangers of high population and to develop a more positive attitude towards limitation of family size as a primary step to development .en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleThe determinants of fertility among urban and rural Women in Kenyaen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherInstitute of population Studies and researchen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record