Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNderitu, J G
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-25T12:18:47Z
dc.date.available2013-05-25T12:18:47Z
dc.date.issued1993
dc.identifier.citationMaster of Scienceen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/25765
dc.description.abstractThe comparative study of resistivity models from Menengai and Olkaria geothermal prospects was carried out in two stages. The first was the re-evaluation of the sub-surface geoelectric structure of Menengai prospect with a view to determining layers that might be associated with geothermal fluid migration, the probable extent of the field and the structural discontinuities. The study was carried out using the results of the symmetrical Schlumberger array with a maximum current electrode spacing of 8000m. The second part dwelt on the comparison of the above with the well documented Olkaria geothermal field model based on the same array. This comparison was done in an attempt to describe the resistivity characteristics of the two geothermal prospects located in the same major structural regime: The Kenyan Rift Valley. The Menengai resistivity data analysis was carried out by curve matching and fitting and 1-0 forward and inverse computer modelling. Geophysical and limited geological data analysis has identified four geoelectrical units with contrasting thicknesses and depths. These are the laterally heterogeneous surficial unit (100 to 200m thick); the resistive caprock (200 to 800m); a conductive unit (5 - 10 Ohm.m, 500 to 1500m) and an electrical substratum (50 - 300 Ohm.m). The deep conductive unit underlying the whole field is envisaged to contain the potential geothermal reservoir with a general discharge of fluids north to north-west. Geoelectric structural models on line profiles have identified horst-graben structures bound by normal NS and EW trending discontinuities. Some of these coincide with fault zones which are permeable zones of complex fluid migration and sometimes leak to the surface leading to surface geothermal manifestations. Geological correlation in Menengai area is limited due to lack of deep drill holes. The two prospects show comparatively similar sub-surface resistivity patterns within the limits of survey procedures and instrumentations. Both areas are underlain by doming or horst structure deep conductive zones (5 - 10 Ohm.m) which are overlain by intermediate to high resistivity zones which in Olkaria also constitute the present East Olkaria production reservoir. The thicknesses and resisti vities of the above mentioned intermediate to high resistivity zones generally increase westwards in both prospects. Lack of the electric substratum in Olkaria could be attributed to shorter depth of probe in the surveys done, however, in some soundings done this zone is evident. From this study, it is evident that the conductive unit in Menengai which is covered by resistive 'cap' rock offers good prospect for further geothermal exploration. It is further noted that both the Menengai and Olkaria prospects exhibit comparable resistivity patterns within the earlier mentioned limits.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleA comparative study of resistivity models from Menengai and Olkaria Geothermal prospectsen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherDepartment of Geologyen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record