Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaingi, N
dc.contributor.authorBjørn, H
dc.contributor.authorThamsborg, M
dc.contributor.authorNansen, P
dc.contributor.authorBøgh, NC
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-25T12:43:21Z
dc.date.available2013-05-25T12:43:21Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.citationSmall Ruminant Research Volume 23, Issues 2–3, 3 January 1997, Pages 171–181en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/25793
dc.description.abstractThe occurrence of anthelmintic resistance on sixteen sheep farms in Denmark was investigated using the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT), the egg hatch assay (EHA) for thiabendazole (TBZ) and a microlarval development assay (LDA) for TBZ, levamisole (LEV) and ivermectin (IVM). At least two anthelmintics with different modes of action were tested on each farm in the FECRT, depending on the number of sheep available. Less than 95% faecal egg count reduction (FECR) were recorded 10–14 days after treatment with both LEV and IVM on two farms, LEV on two farms, benzimidazoles (BZs) on two farms and IVM on one farm. This indicated resistance to the respective anthelmintics according to the definitions of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology. Trichostrongylus and Ostertagia spp. were the predominant nematode species in both pre-treatment and post-treatment faecal cultures. The LD50 values for TBZ in the EHA for isolates from the two farms where BZ resistance was detected in the FECRT were 0.52 and 1.5 μ M TBZ, indicating resistance. The LD50 values for TBZ for these isolates in the LDA were 0.09 and 1.1 μM. The LD50 values in the LDA for isolates declared resistant to LEV ranged from 0.14 to 1.1 μ M LEV. For IVM, the two resistant isolates had LD50 values of 23 and 24 n M IVM in the LDA. There were gross disagreements in the declaration of resistance between methods of calculating %FECR based on the arithmetic mean and those that use geometric mean eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces. Similarly, inclusion of pre-treatment EPG or control group EPG in the calculation of %FECR influenced declaration of resistance.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi.en
dc.subjectSheepen
dc.subjectNematodesen
dc.subjectAnthelmintic resistanceen
dc.subjectFaecal egg count reduction testen
dc.subjectEgg hatch assayen
dc.subjectLarval development assayen
dc.titleAnthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of sheep in Denmarken
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDanish Centre for Experimental Parasitology, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C., Denmarken
local.publisherDepartment of Pharmacology and Pathobiology, Laboratory of Pharmacology, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C., Denmarken
local.publisherDepartment of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053, Nairobi, Kenyaen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record