Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOdongo, MO
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-27T07:31:20Z
dc.date.available2013-05-27T07:31:20Z
dc.date.issued1987-09
dc.identifier.citationDegree of Master of Science in Veterinary Microbiology.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/26050
dc.descriptionThis dissertation was presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the Degree of Master of Science in Veterinary Microbiology.en
dc.description.abstractSeventy one isolates of Salmonella livingstone were analysed for homogenuity using biotyping, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and plasmid profile analysis. Biotyping distinguished Salmonella livingstone isolates into 4 biogroups. Biogroup 1 (45%) and 2 (36.6%) were the most prevalent whereas biogroups 3 (9.9%) and 4 (8.5%) were rare. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed 6 antimicobial resistant patterns with resistance to both streptomycin 10 ug and compound sulphonomide 50 ug (18.6%) and, to compound sulphonamide alone (18.6%) being the most common, followed by multiple resistance to streptomycin, compound sulphonamide and sulphafu- razole (17.1%) and those resistance to any of the above drugs were 27.1 percent of the total. All isolates were susceptible to ampicillin 10 ug (AMP), tetracycline 10 ug (TE), neomycin 10 ug (H), chloramphenicol 10,ug (C), co-trimoxazole 25 ug (SXT), furazolidone 15 ug (FR), cephalorodine 25 ug (CR), kanamycin 30 ug (K), nalidixic acid 30 ug (NA), gentamicin 10'ug (CN), colistin sulphate 10 ug (CT), and carbenicillin 100 ug (CAR). All the 71 isolates were resistant to cloxacillin 10 ug(OB), fusidic acid 10 ug (FD), lincomycin 2 ug (MY), novobiocin 5 ug (NV), penicillin G 1.5 ug (P), methicillin 10 ug (MET), enthromycin 10 ug (E) and sulphadiazine 50 ug (SD). Only 46.8 percent of the Salmonella livingstone isolates had plasmids. Of these, 82.8 percent had light plasmids of between 3.3 and 9.1 Mega daltons, 13.8 percent had heavy plasmids of between 33 and 120 Mega daltons (Mda1), and 3.4 percent had both light and heavy plasmids. There was no correlation between possession of plasmids and antimicrobial resistance overall, but within biogroups, there was some correlation. Biotyping was even superior to antimicrobial susceptibility testing in correlating isolates to source, and plasmid profile analysis was more specific and superior to the other two methods in correlating isolates to source even within the same biogroup. The three methods used proved useful for tracing the sources of Salmonella livingstone and are recommended in future epidemiological studies of this serotype.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titleMultiple typing of salmonella livingstone by biotyping, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and plasmid profile analysisen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherDepartment of Microbiologyen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record