Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWayne, Lloyd Mckim
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-28T14:56:03Z
dc.date.available2013-05-28T14:56:03Z
dc.date.issued1974-08
dc.identifier.citationDoctor of Philosophy in Geography, Northwestern University,1974.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/26629
dc.description.abstractThe process of pla~~ng for economic development is e~~n9d ~~th 81!lphasison the role of spatial interactions in gaining a clearer understanding of the spatial organization of an area. in delimi t,ing planning regions-, and in identifying under-served areas at the national and local level. Aconceptual frameworkis presented in O1apter 1which identifies 9 stages in a process leading to spatial economi.e deve.l.opmerrt , Data on locational attributes, central place functions and spatial interactions are collected. analyzed, ~nd synthesized into a co~~rehensive ·liew of the spatial orgar~zation of an area in the first 4 stages. Planr.ingregions are then identified, based on the spatial organization and on the deveLopmerrtstrategy articulated by tho government. A . . process in then needed which compares the costs of specific develop- Montpro~cts with the progress they produce tOloT3.rdst.he identified goals of economic development. ~lementation of the plans and evaluation of the progress towards t.he deve.Iopmerrtgoals round out t.'le 9 stages leading to ~patial economic developm9nt. Keyterms used in thi::. study are defined and selected re l evarrt .. literature briony re-..r1..ew~d irl Chapter 2. Important topics and • 2 definitions i~lude econo~c development (including contrasting similar terms), spatial organization, regional development planning, growth center theory, and spatial interactions. The.Most important term, econoed.c development, is briefly defined as a process whereby increased productivity and its benefits are spread to a larger proportion of the population within a given areal unit. The origins and development of the Kenyan urban system are traced in Chapter 3. The location and growth of the centers in Kenya are shown to be influenced by the physical structure of the landscape t and m~re importantly. by the goals and technology of the people living in Kenya and trading with Kenyans , The current spatial organization is strongly influenced by the Arab, Portuguese and Indian tradir~ communities established along the coast between 1000 and 1850 A.D. and the British colonial policies of slavery prohibition. trade with the Baganda, rail"m.y construction, encouragement of Enropean settlers in the highlands. and the emphasis on export of agricultural pro~Jets. The current spatial organization is depicted in Chapter 4. using locational attribute information, central place functional data, and especially data on the interactions between places. A seven day 1969 telephone call sample is arAlJ~ed using the nodal flow technique. transaction flow analysis and regression of the gravity nodel. The results of each of these analyses are wApped and compared with each ~-, other and with the nodal flow pattern of a 1963 telephone call sample. ~l flows from 40 selected centers are eY~ned and compared to tile telephone call patterns. BUs service for a part_ of the count~ (southwestern Kenya) is mapped and exami.ned, This type of interaction data is especially useful for places which have no telephone or reail service. A three level hierarchy of plannir~ regtons is proposed for Kenya; macro-planning regions. planning regions. and local planning regions. A map presents the plarJdng regions for Kenya at the top two levels, based on functional and interactional data. Chapter .5 demonstrate s the value of spatial planning at the lccal planning region level through a detailed examinntion of a selected local functional region, the Nyambeni Hills. northeast of }fount Kenya. Locationsl attributes. central place functional information, the transportatimnetwork and the flows of goods. people and ideas are examined for a comprehensive picture of the spatial organization of the area. The central place functional p'l.anrd.ngas carried out by the Kenya Government is briefly examined with particular reference to the lack of attention given tc interactional functions. Furt~er specific proposals are made wn1ch ~~uld aid in the develop~ent of the l~eni area. The perspective from the local planning level ~th inclusion of interaction data are additions ~nich aid in the identification of p'Ianrd.ngprojects at the national level.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi.en
dc.titleThe role of interaction in spatial economic development planning: a case study from Kenyaen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherDepartment of Geography, Northwestern Universityen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record