Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRogo, Lucie M
dc.contributor.authorKhamala, C. P. M
dc.contributor.authorMutinga, M. J
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-06T11:49:20Z
dc.date.available2013-06-06T11:49:20Z
dc.date.issued1989
dc.identifier.citation8Jochemical SystemauC$ 8fId Ecology, Vol. 16. No. 7/8. pp.65!'r659. 1988.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDEQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mosquitocatalog.org%2Ffiles%2Fpdfs%2FSandfly%2FSF07230719.pdf&ei=g3WwUY2TCKiy0QXz7IBw&usg=AFQjCNHexye837Rr_UK8y96ElbehvO27aQ&bvm=bv.47534661,d.d2k
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/29214
dc.description.abstractFemales of the vector of Leishmania aerhiopica, Phlebotomus pedifer. have previously been morphologically indistinguishable from the non-vector. P. elegonensis. The present studies have biochemically separated these two species. Differences were observed in the mobility of four enzymes. GPI. HK, leo and PGM on thin.Jayer starch gel electrophoresis. Using the isoelectric focusing technique. the two species could be differentiated by one enzyme. GPI.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleBiochemical identification of Phlebotomus (Larroussius) pedifer and Phlebotomus (Larroussius) elegonensisen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record