The causes and effects of marginalization of African countries within the world trade Organization (WTO), 1956-2006
Dijeng, Anthony C
MetadataShow full item record
This dissertation examines the marginalization of African countries within the World Trade Organization (WTO). The major objectives of the study is to find out if Africa benefits from the WTO agreements and/or rounds; to establish whether Africa has an enhanced share in the World trade; to establish whether the WTO has African interests in World trade issues; and to identify key issues of concern to African Countries in WTO. The World Trade Organization (WTO), was legally created on 1 January 1995 with a membership of 128 countries. Its emergence was a partly response to the changing imperatives of the international trading system in the 1990s. It was established from the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The (jA TT was considered a poor substitute to the aborted International Trade Organization (lTO). GATT was formed from parts of the International Trade Organization, a proposed specialized agency of the United Nations. GATT was established with minimal institutional arrangements, in order to expedite its approval; it was supposed to be temporary, and its functions were to be assumed by the ITO. It is, however worth mentioning that the idea behind the formation of the ITO was, because the industrial stated that prepared the Havana Charter needed approval of the participating less developed countries (LDCs), the charter incorporated provisions that took into account some of the provisions that tool into account some of the LDCs special needs. Moreover the international trade organization (ITO) opened possibility for participation in the management of international trade. The Havana Charter and the ITO, never came into IV effect. The notion of the "less developed countries", negative connotations in itself to some scholars; those who live in a European or North American city cannot easily envision the conditions that are a way of life for hundred of millions of people in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Only a provisional visit can transform academic descriptions into living images of deprivation, squalor, and helplessness. The term less-developed countries (LDCs), used in current literature resembles a decent garment thrown over the emaciated shoulders and the swollen belly of a sickly, malnourished child. It may conceal some of the ugliness but it does not give an accurate image of real ity. The creation of the WTO was also a function of the elaborate negotiation process that resulted in what may be described as a "Grand Bargain". The creation of a multilateral trade organization was not on the agenda when the Uruguay Round was launched. Due to the dissatisfactions that were brewing around GATT the WTO came into being. The first seven rounds of negotiations were launched in Geneva (1974); in Annecy, France (1949); in Torquay, England (1950-1951); and in Geneva (1955- 1956, 1961-1962 [the Dillon Round], 1964-1967 [the Kennedy Round], and1973- 1979 [the Tokyo Round]). The eighth round, launched in Punta del Este, Uruguay (1986-1993 [the Uruguay Round]), was the one from which the WTO was born. The World Trade Organization (WTO), was formed in 1995. Its predecessor organizations are GATT and ITO. Ever since the inception of the World Trade Organization, African member countries have not fully benefited from the mandate governing it. The WTO has a multiplicity of roles which may have not been beneficial to African member-states. The areas of interest are the number of v objectives which are questionable as to whether they are a practical backdrop to the African context. These objectives are; improved standards of living, full employment, and an enhanced share of developing countries in the world trade. The area of utmost concern is, however, whether African countries have benefited from the so-called reciprocal and mutual advantageous arrangements directed at the substantial reduction if tariffs and other barriers to trade and to the elimination of discriminatory treatment in international liberalization of trade. Although the core objective of the WTO is confined to trade liberalization, African countries seem to have found themselves not fully benefiting from this arrangement. 'The consequence of this is that Africa has become marginal in Europe's trade and, more tellingly, in its attention. Trade liberalization within the World Trade Organization (WTO) has also sidelined Africa. The notion" of trade liberalization, among others, was to adhere to the lowering of tariffs by all member states regardless of their stature. The African situation is that, does it really have such products that it is best at producing? This is related to the concept comparative advantage. Even if it might be having such products are they quality enough to fairly compete in the world market? African countries have to some extent not been able to fully participate in world trade since the developed countries have adopted the protectionist policies on their products. This has caused African countries to fail in participating in world trade. VI The other area of concern is that African countries have found themselves in a situation of marginalization or putting African countries in the periphery. It is worth noting that, 'the key feature of the international economy is the decision of the world into core, semi-periphery and periphery areas. Within the semi-periphery and the periphery there exist cores which are tied into the capitalist world economy, whilst within even the core are there are peripheral economic areas. In all of this that matter is the dominance of the power not of states but of international capitalism, and it is these factors that ultimately determine the main political patterns in world politics. This environment has compelled Africa to fail in shaping the WTO to her advantage. African countries, have therefore, become rule-takers rather than agenda setters. It is worth noting that some officials from African member states have failed to influence key decision making meetings since a good many of them lack bargaining skills .
CitationPost graduate diploma in strategic studies
University of NairobiCollege of humanities and social studies