Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNjenga, J M
dc.contributor.authorBwangamoi, O
dc.contributor.authorKangethe, E K
dc.contributor.authorMugera, G M
dc.contributor.authorMutiga, E R
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-13T12:17:31Z
dc.date.available2013-06-13T12:17:31Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Research Communications 1995, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 295-308en
dc.identifier.urihttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01839312#
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/33057
dc.description.abstracten
dc.description.abstractComparative transmission electron microscopy on Besnoitia besnoiti and on a strain of Besnoitia derived from goats in Kenya revealed that the two organisms differ in their pellicle, micropore, microtubules, nucleus, wall-forming body 1 (W1), amount of lipids and amylopectin. Thus the caprine besnoitia is probably a different organism and the term Besnoitia caprae should continue to be used. Keywords: Besnoitia besnoiti, Besnoitia caprae, cystozoite, goat, ultrastructure, speciation
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.subjectBesnotia besnoiti,Besnoitia caprae,cystozoite,goat,ultrastructure,speciationen
dc.titleComparative ultrastructural studies onBesnoitia besnoiti andBesnoitia capraeen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record