Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuyila, Jackson Wafula
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-19T14:00:42Z
dc.date.available2013-06-19T14:00:42Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationWAFULA, DRMUYILAJACKSON, WAFULA DRMUYILAJACKSON. 2009. The epistemological construction of Gender Inequality. Horizons Vol.1,no 1 jan/May 2009. : Hekimaen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11295/36326
dc.description.abstractThis article contends that much of the knowledge on gender that we have inherited from the past is largely false and full of deliberate distortions, bias and misconceptions. It is argued that in the construction of this knowledge,philosophers, who are supposed to be seekers of the truths, were active participants. Eminent philosophers such as pythagoras, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas and Jean Jacques Rousseau, among others, were active participants in the construction of a false episteme on gender. Yet, the influence of these philosophers on the global thought systems has been enormours, and, therefore, the entrenchment of a false gender episteme in the world. The article further argues that such a false episteme forces women to distort their true selves so as to fit into the description of this episteme as a survival tactic. This, in turn, has served to 'validate' past distortions presented as accurate and profound account of gender. In order to get out of this epistemological conspiracy and trap, the article concludes that there is need for a fresh start; a rigorous doubt and reexamination of inherited epistemologies in order to usher in a new and objective gender epistemology.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectEpistemological constructionen
dc.subjectGender Inequalityen
dc.titleThe epistemological construction of Gender Inequalityen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record