Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShrum, Wesley
dc.contributor.authorDzorgbo, Dan-Bright S
dc.contributor.authorMbatia, Paul
dc.contributor.authorSooryamoorthy, R
dc.contributor.authorYnalvez, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorDuque, Ricardo B
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-24T12:40:26Z
dc.date.available2013-06-24T12:40:26Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/39018
dc.description.abstractWe examine the ways in which the research process differs in developed and developing areas by focusing on two questions. First, is collaboration associated with productivity? Second, is access to the Internet (specifically use of email) associated with reduced problems of collaboration? Recent analyses by Lee & Bozeman (2005) and Walsh & Maloney (2003) suggest affirmative answers to these questions for US scientists. Based on a comparative analysis of scientists in Ghana, Kenya, and the State of Kerala in south-western India (N 918), we find that: (1) collaboration is not associated with any general increment in productivity; and (2) while access to email does attenuate research problems, such difficulties are structured more by national and regional context than by the collaborative process itself. The interpretation of these results suggests a paradox that raises issues for future studies: those conditions that unsettle the relationship between collaboration and productivity in developing areas may undermine the collaborative benefits of new information and communication technologies.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleCollaboration Paradox Scientific Productivity, the Internet, and Problems of Research in Developing Areasen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Sociology and Social Worken


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record