Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBigsten, A
dc.contributor.authorKimuyu, P
dc.contributor.authorLundvall, K
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T06:53:27Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T06:53:27Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationDevelopment Policy Review Volume 22, Issue 6, pages 701–715, November 2004en
dc.identifier.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2004.00272.x/abstract
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/39407
dc.description.abstractAlmost all informal firms in the Kenyan manufacturing sector are managed by Kenyans of African origin. Formal enterprises are run by Kenyans of both African and Asian origin. These three groups are distinct in terms of experience, productivity and access to finance. Asian formal firms are the most efficient, while there is no significant productivity difference between informal and formal African firms. There are thus weak incentives for African informal firms to become formal. At the same time, Kenya needs higher investments and larger exports to achieve economic take-off, and this can only be achieved through an efficient formal sector. Therefore policy should aim to integrate the sectors by improving infrastructure, capacity-building, credit delivery, and supporting networks.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleWhat to Do with the Informal Sector?en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record