Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHlushchuk, R
dc.contributor.authorMakanya, AN
dc.contributor.authorDjonov, V
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T13:57:16Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T13:57:16Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationHlushchuk R, Makanya AN, Djonov V.,Escape mechanisms after antiangiogenic treatment, or why are the tumors growing again?,Int J Dev Biol. 2011;55(4-5):563-7en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21858777
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/39842
dc.description.abstractInhibitors of angiogenesis and radiation induce compensatory changes in the tumor vasculature both during and after cessation of treatment. In numerous preclinical studies, angiogenesis inhibitors were shown to be efficient in the treatment of many pathological conditions, including solid cancers. In most clinical trials, however, this approach turned out to have no significant effect, especially if applied as monotherapy. Recovery of tumors after therapy is a major problem in the management of cancer patients. The mechanisms underlying tumor recovery (or therapy resistance) have not yet been explicitly elucidated. This review deals with the transient switch from sprouting to intussusceptive angiogenesis, which may be an adaptive response of tumor vasculature to cancer therapy that allows the vasculature to maintain its functional properties. Potential candidates for molecular targeting of this angioadaptive mechanism are yet to be elucidated in order to improve the currently poor efficacy of contemporary antiangiogenic therapies.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi,en
dc.titleEscape mechanisms after antiangiogenic treatment, or why are the tumors growing again?en
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology,en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record