Assessing Asylum Claims in Africa: Missing or Meeting Standards?
View/ Open
Date
2006Author
Abuya, EO
Wachira, GM
Type
ArticleLanguage
enMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article reviews the procedures used to determine refugee applications. Using Kenya and Egypt as case studies, it discusses the basic international due-process considerations that should be observed when adjudicating asylum claims. Issues surrounding access to territory and procedural information, the competency of decision-makers, and legal assistance and advice in making applications are evaluated. Also examined are the nature of asylum decisions and the extent to which these outcomes promote appeal rights. It is contended that adjudication procedures fall considerably short of due-process guarantees. The article concludes that, in order to meet minimum standards, a comprehensive approach is required.
URI
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract;jsessionid=D47EE7BF2F5AC27BA3065019C9A91614.journals?fromPage=online&aid=500448http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/40667
Citation
Netherlands International Law Review / Volume 53 / Issue 02 / August 2006, pp 171-204Publisher
Univesity of Nairobi Department of Private Law