Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKitala, PM
dc.contributor.authorMcDermott, JJ
dc.contributor.authorColeman, PG
dc.contributor.authorDye, C
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-27T15:18:27Z
dc.date.available2013-06-27T15:18:27Z
dc.date.issued2002-08
dc.identifier.citationEpidemiol Infect. 2002 Aug;129(1):215-22.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hinari-gw.who.int/whalecomwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/whalecom0/pubmed/12211590
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/41287
dc.description.abstractDemographic and epidemiological field data were used in a deterministic model to describe dog rabies transmission in Machakos District, Kenya and to predict the impact of potential vaccination strategies for its control. The basic reproduction number (R0) was estimated to be 2.44 (1.52-3.36, 95% confidence limits). There were three key model predictions. The first was that a threshold dog density (K(T)) of 4.5 dogs km(-2) (3.8-5.2 dogs km(-2), 95% confidence limits) was required to maintain transmission. The second was that the estimated annual vaccination rate of 24% failed to decrease incidence and actually increased the stability of transmission and may be counter-productive. Thirdly, to control rabies, it was predicted that 59% (34%-70%, 95% confidence limits) of dogs should be vaccinated at any one time. This requires approximately 70% coverage for annual but only 60% coverage for semi-annual vaccination campaigns. Community-level vaccination trials are needed to test these predictions.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity Of Nairobi.en
dc.titleComparison of vaccination strategies for the control of dog rabies in Machakos District, Kenya.en
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Public Health, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, Kenyaen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record