Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMitullah, Winnie
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-29T12:17:00Z
dc.date.available2013-06-29T12:17:00Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationUrban Slums Reports: The case of Nairobi, Kenyaen
dc.identifier.issnhttp://www.ucl.ac.uk/dpu-projects/Global_Report/pdfs/Nairobi_bw.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/42473
dc.description.abstractUrbanisation in Kenya has a long history with urban agglomeration in the form of trading centres being found along the Kenyan coast as early as the 9th Century AD (Obudho 1988: 3) . However, the growth of many urban centres can be traced to the pre-independence period when they were used as centres of administrative and political control by the colonial authorities (UNCHS 1985). Table 1.0 shows that the process of urbanisation in Kenya, which had been rapid in the 1979-1989 period, seems to be declining. The proportion of Kenyans living in urban centres1 increased from 5.1 per cent in 1948 to 15.1 per cent in 1979, to 18.0 per cent in 1989 and 34.8 per cent in 2000. There are currently 194 urban centres, with 45 per cent of the urban population residing in Nairobi (GOK 1996:35; GOK 1989:74; GOK 2001). The growth of the urban population, which has resulted from both natural population growth and ruralurban migration, has led to an increased demand for resources required to meet the consequent demand for infrastructure services (Olima 2001). Statistical analysis shows that the rank size distribution of the urban places that comprise this urban population is and will be well distributed, corresponding to what regional geographers would consider as balanced (GOK 1993:7) The evident slowing2 of growth of the urban population in Kenya opens up possibilities for social and economic consolidation, aimed at bringing about a balance between rural and urban growth (GOK 1993:6). However, while demographic projections show that rural migration will also slow down, the position in respect of the economy has not been good. Economic growth has slowed from an average of 3.8 per cent per annum in 1986-90. It further continued to decline, from 1.8 per cent in 1998 to 1.4 per cent in 1999, -0.2 per cent in 2000 and increased marginally to 1.2 per cent in 2001 (GOK 2002). As is clear from Table 1, Nairobi continues to have the dominant share of the national urban population. With an urban primacy index of 2.6, Nairobi has continued to develop as a primate city in Kenya, based on the “Eleven-City Index” on urban primacy (GOK 2002:236).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleThe case of Nairobi ,Kenyaen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten
local.publisherUniversity of Nairobien


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record