Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoeko, Saito-jensen
dc.contributor.authorNathan, Iben
dc.contributor.authorThorsten, Treue
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-29T12:34:01Z
dc.date.available2013-06-29T12:34:01Z
dc.date.issued2010-09
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Conservation Environmental Conservation / Volume 37 / Issue 03 / September 2010, pp 327-335en
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract;jsessionid=DA93A628808225AE824108032BE82B5F.journals?fromPage=online&aid=7911292
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/42485
dc.description.abstractCommunity-based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects and policies often aim to improve the livelihoods of rural people who depend on natural resources, and to promote democratic decision making and equitable benefit distribution at the local level. However, a growing number of critics argue that CBNRM is susceptible to elite capture. This paper contributes to the debate on elite capture under CBNRM by studying joint forest management (JFM) in Andhra Pradesh (India) and, in particular, the case of Mohammed Nagar village. The paper addresses the following four questions: (1) How has the Indian Government formally addressed the risk of elite capture? (2) What actually happened over time when formal structures of JFM interacted with the pre-existing social structure in Mohammed Nagar? (3) When JFM results in elite capture, is this owing to the formal structures and/or the pre-existing social structure? (4) How can CBNRM be designed to avoid or minimize elite capture? Based on a reading of official government documents, the Indian Government has addressed the risk of elite capture, by ensuring representation of different social groups in the decision making bodies, regular elections, collective action in rule making and implementation, and transparency in record keeping. Nevertheless, during Mohammed Nagar's 10 years of JFM history elite capture did occur. This confirms that elite capture is a possible outcome of CBNRM. Yet, the subsequent fall of elite capture in the village also indicates that this is not necessarily a permanent outcome, and that CBNRM may in fact promote democratic and equitable resource management in the long-term. In Mohammed Nagar elite capture was largely owing to pre-existing social structures and to weaknesses in the official rules that were meant to safeguard the interests of marginalized groups. Accordingly, in CBNRM project design and implementation, pre-existing social structures' potential promotion of elite capture need to be taken into account and formal measures that might alleviate the adverse effects and/or reduce this risk must be identified.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi.en
dc.subjectcommon pool resourceen
dc.subjectcommunity-based natural resource managementen
dc.subjectelite captureen
dc.subjectjoint forest managementen
dc.subjectparticipationen
dc.titleBeyond elite capture? Community-based natural resource management and power in Mohammed Nagar village, Andhra Pradesh, Indiaen
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherWangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studiesen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record