Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKyalo, Michael Makau
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-02T13:40:51Z
dc.date.available2013-07-02T13:40:51Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationMichael Makau Kyalo (2012). Prevalence, Intensity And Pathology Associated With Helminth Infections In Indigenous Chickens In Kiambu And Nairobi Counties, Kenya. Masters Of Science In Applied Veterinary Parasitologyen
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/44155
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the present study was to establish the prevalence, intensity and pathology associated with helminths infections in three age groups and sexes of free range indigenous chickens from farms and markets in Kiambu and Nairobi Counties. A total of 108 indigenous chickens were purchased from the farms and 48 from the markets. The farm birds were from three agroecological zones (AEZ), namely; Lower highland I (LH1) in Kiambu West District, Lower midland 4 (LM4) in Thika West District, both in Kiambu County and Lower midland 5 (LMS) in Embakasi District, Nairobi County. Market birds were from Kasarani, Jogoo road (Burma), Uthiru and Lirnuru. On necropsy examination of the chickens, worms were recovered from various parts of the gastro intestinal tract, quantified and identified. Tissues for histopathology were processed, examined and severity of lesions determined. Overall the prevalence rates of helminths were 89.8 % and 95.8 % in farm and market chickens, respectively (p>O.OS). Farm chickens had nematodes (87 %) with Heterakis gallinarum (SI.9 %) being the most prevalent followed by Ascaridia galli (47.2 %) and Tetramere species (21.3 %) while the cestodes (S4.6 %) were Raillietina echinobothrida (30.3 %) as the most prominent followed by Hymenolepis species (20.4 %). Market chickens had Heterakis gallinarurn (S2.1%), Heterakis isolonche (31.3 %) and Ascaridia galli (31.3 %) as the most prevalent nematodes (93.8 %) while Raillietina echinobothrida (43.8 %) and Hymenolepis species (29.2 %) were most prevalent cestodes (70.8 %). Echinostoma revolutum (6.3 %), a trematode was found in market chickens for the first time in Kenya. Among the age groups in farm chickens, adults and-growers had equal and higher prevalence rate of nematodes (97.2 %) compared to chicks (75 %) (p<0.05), while in market chickens, all adults (100 %) and 91.7 % of growers examined were infected (p<0.05). Between the sexes, 88.9 % of males and 85.2 % of females of the farm chickens were infected (p>0.05) while in the market chickens, 83.3 % of males and all females were infected (p<0.05). For the cestodes, the prevalence rate in adults (69.4 %) was highest in farm chickens followed by growers (61.1 %) and chicks (33.3 %). The difference was statistically significant between the chicks and the other ages of chickens (p < 0.05). For the market chickens, adults (87.5 %) were higher than grower birds (54.2 %). Infection rate by cestodes was 63 % and 52 % for the male and female farmed chickens, respectively, while it was 75.0 % and 66.7 % in male and female marketed chickens. Nematode infections were most prevalent in the LH1 (97.2 %), followed by LM4 (94.4 %) and LM5 (77.8 %). Lower midland 4 had the highest prevalence ofcestodes (86.1 %) followed by LHI (63.9 %) and LM5 (36.1 %). The difference_was statistically significant between the LM5 and the other AEf.{p·< 0.05). The cool climat~ in LH1 could promote the presence of intermediate hosts for the helminths leading to the highest prevalence rate. Among the age groups, adults and growers have reached equilibrium for most of the infections and the prevalence rate of infection is either equal or the difference is not significant (p> 0.05). The intensities of nematodes ranged from 0 - 875 worms with an average of212 worms per chicken in farm chickens while in the market chickens, the range was from 0 - 550 worms and an average of 73 worms per chicken. The gross lesions observed in farm and market chickens were 74.1 % and 72.9 %, respectively (p>0.05). In farm chickens, the gross lesions in chicks, growers and adults were 27.5 %,37.5 % and 35 % (p>0.05), respectively while between the sexes; females had a higher prevalence of 52.5 % than males, 47.5 % (p>0.05). Among the agro ecological zones, both LHI and LM5 had higher and equal prevalence of35.0% than LM4, 30 % (p>0.05). In market chickens, the prevalence in growers and adults were 54.3 %and 45.7 %(p>O.05), respectively while males had a higher prevalence of 54.3 % than females, 45.7 % (p>O.05). The gross lesions found were oedema, thickening and obstruction ofthe proventriculus which was associated with the female Tetrameres species infection. There was also destruction of the proventricular glands and petechial haernorrhages in chickens infected with Dispharynx nasuta. Acuaria hamulosa were found embedded in nodules in the gizzards of the infected chickens. The occurrence of microscopic lesions was higher in growers among the age groups in both farm and market birds while between sexes, females in farm chickens had a higher prevalence of occurrence of microscopic lesions than males in all gut sections examined. In market chickens, males had higher prevalence rates of microscopic lesions than females in gut sections. The lesions observed included pressure atrophy of glandular epithelium resulting to necrosis and cross sections of females of Tetramere species in the proventriculi of the infected chickens. The lesions were more severe with extensive mucosal ulcerations and glandular destruction in cases where Dispharynx nasuta was isolated. In farm chickens, 35.2% of the proventriculi had lesions of which 55.3% were attributed to parasites while in market chickens, 54.2% had lesions with 42.3% being attributed to parasites. The parasites were associated with both severe and mild pathological lesions in both farm and market chickens (p<O.05). The microscopic lesions in gizzards of chickens infected with D. nasuta and A. hamulosa, were mononuclear cell infiltration and sections of the parasites surrounded by granulocytes and lymphocytes. The lesions were seen in 5.6 % of the gizzards from farm birds and 40 % was associated with the parasites. For the market chickens, 12.5% had lesions with 16.7% being associated to A. hamulosa. Most of the lesions in both farm and market chickens were mild and statistically associated with the presence of parasites (p<O.05). The microscopic lesions seen in caeca were cross section of worms in the caecal lumen and lamina propria. There were also cellular infiltrations mainly mononuclear cells and granulocytes. Other changes were epithelial desquamation, haemorrhages and infiltration into lamina propria by plasma cells. In farm chickens, 71.3 % of the caeca had lesions and 85.9% had parasites while 79 % of market chickens had lesions with 86.8% having parasites. Pathological lesions were mild in both farm and market chickens but only statistically associated to parasites in farm chickens (p<0.05) A total of 60.2 % of the farm Chicken were infested with ectoprasites while market birds had a prevalence of 77.1 %. Most of the birds had mixed infestations. The most prevalent ectoparasite was Echidnophaga gallinacea (41.7 %) followed by Knemidocoptes mutans (27.8 %). Other ectoparasites isolated were fowl tick (Argas persicus) and lice. In conclusion, this study established that indigenous chickens in the three agro-ecological zones and markets have high prevalence of helminths. The prevalence rates varied according to the age, sex of the chickens and agro-ecological zone. Among the helminths, nematodes were most prevalent followed by cestodes and trematodes. The helminths infections were associated with gross and Inicroscopic lesions which may affect the health and productivity of the chicken. There is need for further investigation 'on the impact of helminth infections in the indigenous chickens of various agro - ecological zones in Kenya.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien
dc.titlePrevalence, Intensity And Pathology Associated With Helminth Infections In Indigenous Chickens In Kiambu And Nairobi Counties, Kenyaen
dc.typeThesisen
local.publisherDepartment Of Veterinary Pathology, Microbiology and Parasitologyen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record